Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988810›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Telemedicine: Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Martina Rossi, Shajeel Rehman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martina RossiResearch, Private, Strasbourg, FRA.
Shajeel RehmanOccupational Health, The State University of New York (SUNY) Farmingdale State College (FSC), New York City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare by enabling remote diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. However, challenges such as clinician workload, data variability, and technological disparities hinder its full potential. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers solutions by automating diagnostics, predictive analytics, and real-time monitoring, yet its integration into telemedicine presents ethical, regulatory, and implementation challenges. This review explores the role of AI in telemedicine, identifying key applications, challenges, and future directions. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from 2015 to 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Of the 40 identified articles, 31 met the inclusion criteria for thematic evaluation. Relevant studies were selected based on predefined criteria, and thematic evaluation identified trends, barriers, and innovations in AI-driven telemedicine. AI has been successfully implemented in diverse telemedicine applications. In dermatology, AI-driven image analysis achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to experts. Ophthalmology benefits from AI-enhanced screening for diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. AI-powered chatbots and digital assistants improve mental health support and patient triage. Wearable devices utilizing AI facilitate continuous monitoring of cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. Emerging technologies such as blockchain-based digital pathology and decentralized AI models have been proposed, and in some cases demonstrated in proof-of-concept studies, to enhance data protection and accessibility in telemedicine. However, challenges persist, including algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, regulatory inconsistencies, and limited real-world validation of AI models. Overall, evidence from multiple specialties indicates that AI can enhance telemedicine by improving diagnostic accuracy, patient monitoring, and remote healthcare delivery. However, the degree of benefit varies across clinical domains, and most studies remain limited in real-world validation. Moreover, ethical considerations, regulatory compliance, and model generalizability require further research. Addressing these gaps will ensure equitable, effective, and scalable AI-driven telemedicine solutions. Future efforts should focus on improving interoperability, standardizing guidelines, and integrating privacy-preserving AI models to facilitate widespread adoption.

Indexed as

algorithmic biasartificial intelligencedata privacydigital healthmachine learningremote healthcaretelemedicinewearable technology

Identifiers

PMID40988810
PMCPMC12453293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.