ReviewCureus2025
Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Telemedicine: Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastric Cancer: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Developments, Evidence Maturity, and Translational Challenges.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Comorbidity Burden and Radiological Features Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Predictive Analytics to Optimize Tele-Oncology Implementation in Rural Settings: Scoping Review.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- The role of health literacy and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in the acceptance of telemedicine services among adults in Turkey: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Family Medicine in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Perspectives, Directions, and Future Opportunities; A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Care of Terminally Ill Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Wearable Biosensing and Machine Learning for Data-Driven Training and Coaching Support.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Impact of Community-Oriented Medical Education on Medical Students' Perceptions of Community Health Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Review
- Telemedicine to Improve Medical Care of Fishermen in Pelagic Fisheries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Editorial: The Role of Telemedicine in Transforming Healthcare Delivery-Capabilities and Barriers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From algorithms to clinical execution: A cross-validated knowledge atlas of AI-enabled precision care (2015-2025).Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare by enabling remote diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. However, challenges such as clinician workload, data variability, and technological disparities hinder its full potential. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers solutions by automating diagnostics, predictive analytics, and real-time monitoring, yet its integration into telemedicine presents ethical, regulatory, and implementation challenges. This review explores the role of AI in telemedicine, identifying key applications, challenges, and future directions. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from 2015 to 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Of the 40 identified articles, 31 met the inclusion criteria for thematic evaluation. Relevant studies were selected based on predefined criteria, and thematic evaluation identified trends, barriers, and innovations in AI-driven telemedicine. AI has been successfully implemented in diverse telemedicine applications. In dermatology, AI-driven image analysis achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to experts. Ophthalmology benefits from AI-enhanced screening for diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. AI-powered chatbots and digital assistants improve mental health support and patient triage. Wearable devices utilizing AI facilitate continuous monitoring of cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. Emerging technologies such as blockchain-based digital pathology and decentralized AI models have been proposed, and in some cases demonstrated in proof-of-concept studies, to enhance data protection and accessibility in telemedicine. However, challenges persist, including algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, regulatory inconsistencies, and limited real-world validation of AI models. Overall, evidence from multiple specialties indicates that AI can enhance telemedicine by improving diagnostic accuracy, patient monitoring, and remote healthcare delivery. However, the degree of benefit varies across clinical domains, and most studies remain limited in real-world validation. Moreover, ethical considerations, regulatory compliance, and model generalizability require further research. Addressing these gaps will ensure equitable, effective, and scalable AI-driven telemedicine solutions. Future efforts should focus on improving interoperability, standardizing guidelines, and integrating privacy-preserving AI models to facilitate widespread adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.