ArticleCureus2025
Generalized Rash and Angioedema During Triple Antiepileptic Therapy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with drug-resistant symptomatic focal epilepsy secondary to focal cortical dysplasia, first diagnosed at the age of 15. The patient was on triple antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy: levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), and oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ). Three months after the introduction of oxcarbazepine, she developed a generalized skin rash accompanied by episodic angioedema, manifesting as lip swelling and intermittent dyspnea. Oxcarbazepine was initially discontinued, as it was the most recently introduced drug, but the rash persisted. Lamotrigine was then withdrawn and replaced with lacosamide (LCZ), without significant improvement. Finally, levetiracetam was discontinued and substituted with zonisamide (ZON), resulting in the complete resolution of the cutaneous symptoms. The patient continued to experience two focal seizures per week, consistent with her baseline seizure frequency prior to medication adjustments. This case underscores the importance of recognizing cutaneous adverse effects associated with AEDs and illustrates the therapeutic challenges in managing patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, particularly when adverse drug reactions complicate polytherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.