ArticleCureus2025
Assessing Medical Students' Ophthalmology Exposure and Its Role in Their Speciality Choices: A National Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Ophthalmology remains a competitive speciality requiring early and structured exposure to influence medical students' interest and preparedness. Despite its competitiveness, exposure to ophthalmology in the undergraduate curriculum is minimal, especially in comparison to other specialities. Exposure to ophthalmology, as well as other key factors during medical school and beyond, can affect students' decisions to pursue ophthalmology. Aims This study aimed to evaluate ophthalmology exposure among United Kingdom (UK) medical students and its influence on their likelihood of pursuing ophthalmology as a career. It also aimed to identify factors that can influence this decision. Methods A national cross-sectional survey was administered to final-year UK medical students attending ophthalmology-focused sessions hosted by Mind the Bleep (MTB), a national free educational platform, from December 2024 to April 2025. The survey assessed curricular coverage, teaching quality, alignment with United Kingdom Medical Licensing Assessment (UKMLA) standards, and the impact of these factors on career decision-making. Quantitative responses were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), while thematic analysis of free-text responses was conducted in NVivo. Results Of the 193 respondents, 176 UK-based students were included. Ophthalmology education as a whole was rated poorly in the domains of curricular coverage (mean 2.94/5), teaching support (mean 2.95/5), and alignment with learning needs (mean 2.96/5). A more detailed analysis of external factors influencing students' career intentions revealed that both exposure to ophthalmology (mean 3.86/5, 0.95 Standard Deviation (SD)) and the perceived quality of teaching (mean 3.76/5, 0.95 SD) were positively associated with an increased likelihood of pursuing the speciality. Qualitative responses highlighted work-life balance, placement quality, and career prospects as major additional influences. Conclusions Undergraduate exposure to ophthalmology significantly impacts students' speciality preferences, though current exposure is perceived as insufficient. Enhancing structured ophthalmology teaching and aligning curricula with national standards may encourage more students to consider the speciality. Broader educational reforms should incorporate lifestyle, mentorship, and placement experiences to support informed and equitable career decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.