ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Learning curve of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block: a CUSUM pivotal analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time ultrasound-guided versus landmark techniques for thoracic epidural placement in elderly patients: A randomized comparative study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- [Interlaminar Distance and Bony Landmarks in Lumbar Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Concordance Study].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
- Point-of-care ultrasound for emergency pericardiocentesis: a multidimensional CUSUM analysis of the learning curve.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Precision and safety advantages of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in geriatric anesthesia: current status and future prospects.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aims to dynamically evaluate the learning curve of anesthesiology residents' mastery of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block (US-CEB) through cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis, providing a quantitative basis for optimizing the training program. Methods: After ethical approval and registration, 10 novice anesthesiology residents underwent standardized training in US-CEB. Over 4 months, each of 10 residents performed 30 procedures, totalling 300 cases on 300 patients undergoing perineal and sacrococcygeal surgeries. The CUSUM analysis was applied to measure performance in terms of success rates, procedural times and self-confidence score. Results: The learning curve had two phases: rapid skill acquisition followed by a plateau indicating proficiency. The median time for participants to identify landmarks was 49.5 s, and the US-CEB procedure took 146.6 s. Landmark identification skills plateaued after about 9 procedures, US-CEB skills after 11, and self-confidence after 13. Polynomial modeling showed a strong non-linear relationship between procedures and performance, with high Conclusion: The study shows that US-CEB can be learned quickly with targeted training. A structured initial training and deliberate practice help residents master ultrasound-guided sacral canal block procedures. As operators improve their skills, their confidence increases, fostering continuous development and mastery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.