Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988729›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Inflammatory Reaction and Formation of Adhesions after Intraperitoneal Application of Biological SIS Mesh.

Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samir DelibegovicSurgical Department, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Delibegovic, Idrizovic, and Kuralic).
Enes IdrizovicSurgical Department, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Delibegovic, Idrizovic, and Kuralic).
Muhamed KaticaVeterinary Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Katica and Katica).
Jasminka MustedanagicFaculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Delibegovic, Mustedanagic, and Cickusic).
Elmir CickusicFaculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Delibegovic, Mustedanagic, and Cickusic).
Aida KaticaVeterinary Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Katica and Katica).
Haris KuralicSurgical Department, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Drs. Delibegovic, Idrizovic, and Kuralic).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage. Methods: Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation. Results: There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes. Conclusion: This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.

Indexed as

InflammationIntestinal MucosaSurgical MeshAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHerniorrhaphyIntestine, SmallMalePolydioxanonePolypropylenesRandom AllocationRatsRats, WistarSwineTissue AdhesionsPolydioxanonePolypropylenesAdhesionBiological polypropyleneInflammatory reactionMeshPolydioxanonemesh

Identifiers

PMID40988729
PMCPMC12453008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.