Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988712›Full record

ReviewJournal of nutritional science2025

Sulforaphane as a potential therapeutic agent: a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials and mechanistic insights.

Atsushi Saito, Shoichi Ishikawa, Kun Yang, Akira Sawa, Koko Ishizuka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nutritional science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Atsushi SaitoDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5304-5286
Shoichi IshikawaDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kun YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Akira SawaDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Koko IshizukaDepartment of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Project 3P50MH136297 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Elie Laurent Younes · 2024 to 2026
$12.8M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH136297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulforaphane (SFN), a bioactive compound derived from glucoraphanin in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, has been extensively studied for its therapeutic potential across diverse disease categories. SFN exerts its effects through well-characterised pathways, including the Keap1/Nrf2 axis, which regulates phase II detoxification enzymes, and epigenetic mechanisms such as histone deacetylase inhibition. This review evaluates clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on those using SFN or broccoli-derived extracts. As a result, we identified 84 trials, of which 39 have been published. Results suggest SFN's potential in regulating redox and inflammatory pathways, improving metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, and exerting anti-cancer and neuroprotective effects. For healthy subjects, SFN enhanced detoxification and reduced inflammation. In cancer patients, SFN showed promise in early-stage prostate and breast cancer, particularly in GSTM1-positive individuals, but had limited effects in advanced cases. For brain disorders, SFN demonstrated symptomatic improvements in autism spectrum disorder and cognitive benefits in schizophrenia but lacked robust biomarker integration. SFN had minimal impact on respiratory diseases but showed supportive roles in allergic rhinitis therapy. Metabolic disease studies revealed glycaemic control improvements in type 2 diabetes but no benefits for hypertension. Approximately 50% of completed trials remain unpublished, raising concerns about publication bias. While published results highlight SFN's therapeutic potential, limited sample sizes and inconsistent outcomes underscore the need for more extensive, stratified trials. This review emphasises the importance of integrating mechanistic insights and precision medicine approaches to maximise SFN's clinical utility.

Indexed as

IsothiocyanatesAnticarcinogenic AgentsBrassicaClinical Trials as TopicHumansInflammationNeoplasmsNeuroprotective AgentsSulfoxidesAnticarcinogenic AgentsIsothiocyanatesNeuroprotective AgentssulforaphaneSulfoxidesASD, Autism spectrum disorderBMI, Body mass indexClinical trialsFXTAS, Fragile-X-associated tremor and ataxia syndromeGSTM1, Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1HDAC, Histone deacetylaseHO-1, Heme oxygenase 1InterventionKeap1, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1MechanismsNQO1, NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1Nrf2, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2SFN, SulforaphaneSulforaphaneSZ, Schizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40988712
PMCPMC12451241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.