ReviewChemical science2025
Rational design of the linkers in targeting chimeras.
Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxetane-to-azetidine skeletal editing.Nature chemistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Targeted Lysosomal Degradation of Extracellular and Membrane Proteins: From Receptor Hijacking to Programmable Endolysosomal Routing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Delivering Degradation: Nanomedicine and Programmable Proximity Platforms for Targeted Protein Degradation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Linkerability of Protein Ligands: Insights From Cocrystal Structures and Implications for DNA-Encoded Libraries.Molecular informatics · 2026Article
- Computational mapping of productive POI-E3 ligase conformations to guide de novo degrader design: application to WEE1 and PKMYT1 PROTACs.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeting chimeras (TACs), such as PROTACs, LYTACs, AUTACs, and ATTECs, have emerged as promising strategies for selectively degrading proteins, including undruggable targets. These approaches leverage bifunctional molecules or molecular glues to selectively degrade specific proteins, offering new therapeutic potential for the diseases that traditional small molecules cannot effectively address. The linker of the TACs serving as a bridge, connecting the target protein ligand and effector protein ligand, plays a critical role in determining the molecule's spatial conformation and overall activity. Recent advances in linker design strategies, such as photo-switchable, cleavable, and flexible linkers, have enhanced the efficacy, selectivity, and spatiotemporal control of TACs. Despite these advances, challenges remain in optimizing linker properties to balance stability, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics. In this review, we discuss recent advancements in TACs development and summarize the strategies of linkers' design, including traditional/non-traditional, and functionalized linkers of various TACs. Finally, we highlight current challenges in linker design and explore future opportunities and strategies, hoping to provide inspiration for the development of TACs in drug discovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.