Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988686›Full record

ReviewChemical science2025

Rational design of the linkers in targeting chimeras.

Yiping Duan, Michelle Y Cai, Jinyi Xu, Quanyin Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yiping DuanPharmaceutical Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI 53705 USA qhu66@wisc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5426-2047
Michelle Y CaiPharmaceutical Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI 53705 USA qhu66@wisc.edu.
Jinyi XuDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University Nanjing Jiangsu 211198 P. R. China jinyixu@china.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-0402
Quanyin HuPharmaceutical Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI 53705 USA qhu66@wisc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-1655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting chimeras (TACs), such as PROTACs, LYTACs, AUTACs, and ATTECs, have emerged as promising strategies for selectively degrading proteins, including undruggable targets. These approaches leverage bifunctional molecules or molecular glues to selectively degrade specific proteins, offering new therapeutic potential for the diseases that traditional small molecules cannot effectively address. The linker of the TACs serving as a bridge, connecting the target protein ligand and effector protein ligand, plays a critical role in determining the molecule's spatial conformation and overall activity. Recent advances in linker design strategies, such as photo-switchable, cleavable, and flexible linkers, have enhanced the efficacy, selectivity, and spatiotemporal control of TACs. Despite these advances, challenges remain in optimizing linker properties to balance stability, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics. In this review, we discuss recent advancements in TACs development and summarize the strategies of linkers' design, including traditional/non-traditional, and functionalized linkers of various TACs. Finally, we highlight current challenges in linker design and explore future opportunities and strategies, hoping to provide inspiration for the development of TACs in drug discovery.

Identifiers

PMID40988686
PMCPMC12451458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.