ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The benefits of online access to prescription medicines: the European patient's perspective.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The benefits of online access to prescription medicines: the European patient's perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the evolving EU healthcare landscape, online access to prescription medicines is rising. The EU legislation provides a legal framework for safe online access, aligning supply rules with physical pharmacies and providing specific measures against counterfeiting. Eight Member States allow online access to prescription medicines. Objectives: The study aims to understand factors influencing EU citizens' propensity to obtain prescription medicines online. Methods: The online survey was conducted in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Sweden with 1,000 responses per country, to help ensure representatives in terms of age, gender, and macro-region. Parametric tests and regression analysis to control for confounding factors were used. In countries where online access to prescription medicines was allowed, current usage choices and preferences was asked. In countries where online access was not allowed, questions about the intended use and preferences if prescription medicines became available online was asked. Results: Thirty four percent (34%) of respondents expressed interest in obtaining prescription medicines online. This interest is was slightly higher among people with chronic conditions (36.2%) and their caregivers (41.4%). Respondents facing long distances to pharmacies or perceiving their opening hours as inconvenient expressed a preference for online access. Additionally, a number of respondents believed that online access could improve adherence to prescribed courses of medication. In particular, 64% of the chronically ill respondents who reported adherence problems due to time constraints believed that online access would improve their adherence. In countries where online access was permitted, rates of non-adherence caused by time constraints were 22 percentage points ( Conclusion: Given the findings in this large scale survey and taking in to account the pharmacists interviewed about potential practical barriers, it would seem reasonable for EU Member States who currently prohibit online access to prescription medicines to consider reviewing the current national legislation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.