ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Graphic-style stories to engage limited resource communities and promote health: methods for iterative co-design with community representatives.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: People with lower health literacy and those living in limited-resource communities often experience poorer health outcomes. Leveraging stories for health promotion can be particularly beneficial as stories are more engaging and memorable than other outreach materials. Co-designing health-promotion stories with representatives from target communities ensures their cultural relevance. Methods: We Engage 4 Health (WE4H), a 20 + member community-academic partnership, developed an iterative co-design and testing process for creating engaging and culturally tailored health promotion stories that initiate meaningful discussions about diverse and often complex health topics. Using a graphic-style format, the stories were designed to be read aloud as the story characters together by program participants and lay educators. Herein, we share three case stories. Surveys and an online focus group gathered feedback from 17 community co-designers from a midwestern US city. Results: Over six years, WE4H's flexible co-design cycle facilitated the creation of over 80 stories. Topics included wellness, chronic disease, cancer, citizen science, research participation, and COVID-19/vaccines. Surveys and focus groups indicated that the co-designers felt their ideas were clearly incorporated into the final stories, which made them feel valued and more trusting of the WE4H team. Many developed a sense of ownership of the materials and were more inclined to share the finished products with their communities, strengthening the sustainability of the community-academic partnership and its related outreach programs. Discussion: WE4H's community co-design cycle is iterative and highly transferable for creating culturally appropriate health promotion materials on diverse topics for people of varying abilities, backgrounds, and geographies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.