Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988653›Full record

ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2025

The power of positivity: Exploring affective and social processes of change throughout a positive valence treatment for anxiety or depression.

Madeleine Rassaby, Samantha N Adams, Murray B Stein, Charles T Taylor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03196544 (Novel Behavioral Intervention to Target Social Reward Sensitivity and Attachment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03196544 nacompletednot on this map

Novel Behavioral Intervention to Target Social Reward Sensitivity and Attachment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled75ConditionsAnxiety Disorders and Symptoms, DepressionArmsSocial Approach Training (5 sessions), Social Approach Training (10 sessions)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeleine RassabySan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, USA.
Samantha N AdamsSan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, USA.
Murray B SteinSan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, USA.
Charles T TaylorSan Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Social disconnection is common and disabling in persons with anxiety or depression, yet remains underexplored in treatment research. Proposed mechanisms underlying social disconnection include heightened negative valence system activation (increased negative affect [NA] and sensitivity to social threats) and diminished positive valence system activation (reduced positive affect [PA] and sensitivity to social rewards). Better understanding whether and how changes in affect relate to social connectedness throughout treatment may inform targets for remediation. This study addressed this question among individuals with clinically significant anxiety or depression and impaired social connectedness and functioning who completed a positive valence-targeted psychosocial intervention, Amplification of Positivity (AMP). Method: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from two trials (NCT03196544; NCT049452390), comprising 98 participants randomized to AMP. Longitudinal cross-lagged panel models, accounting for autoregression, examined the within-person, time-dependent relationships between PA and NA (entered concurrently) and subsequent social connectedness (loneliness and friendship) throughout treatment (Aim 1). Reverse models examined the relationships between connectedness and subsequent PA and NA (Aim 2). An exploratory analysis substituted anxiety and depressive symptoms for NA. Results: Higher PA predicted greater perceptions of friendship and lower loneliness at the following time point; NA was not significantly related to either outcome when examined concurrently with PA. Greater perceived friendship predicted higher subsequent PA; the effect of loneliness was non-significant. Neither friendship nor loneliness levels predicted subsequent NA. The same patterns were observed in exploratory symptom models, except lower anxiety (as well as higher PA) predicted lower subsequent loneliness. Conclusions: Higher PA (but not NA) predicted greater subsequent perceived friendship and lower loneliness throughout treatment.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionLonelinessNegative affectPositive affectSocial connectedness

Identifiers

PMID40988653
PMCPMC12452861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.