ArticleBiopolymers2025
On the Rheological Properties and Printability of Sodium Alginate-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Composite Solutions for Tissue Scaffold Printing.
Article in Biopolymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Preparation and Characterization of Alginate-Based Bioinks for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Constructs.Current protocols · 2025Article
- On the Rheological Properties and Printability of Sodium Alginate-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Composite Solutions for Tissue Scaffold Printing.Biopolymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Composites of sodium alginate (Alg) and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) are used to 3D print tissue scaffolds, but the rheological properties and printability of these composites remain underreported, resulting in time-consuming trial-and-error printing. This study investigates these properties to rigorously design the 3D printing process. Dynamic shear tests characterize viscoelastic and frequency-dependent properties, while steady shear tests assess the apparent viscosity and temperature-dependent viscosity. A novel approach based on mass flow rate models guides the printing of two-layer scaffolds for printability analysis. Brightfield microscopy and printability indexes quantify the deviations between printed and designed scaffolds, defined as printability. Results show that Alg predominantly directs the rheological properties. At 4% w/v Alg, the addition of < 3% w/v CMCS reduces elasticity, contrary to the trend where increasing CMCS increases elasticity. CMCS improves the thermal resistance of the composites, while Alg reduces it. Of the composites printed, a 4% w/v Alg + 1% w/v CMCS formulation most accurately replicates the designed scaffold, and adding CMCS improves scaffold printing repeatability by at least threefold compared to Alg-only solutions. These findings provide a framework that informs the preparation and performance of Alg-CMCS composites with tunable properties, advancing scaffold bioprinting for tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.