ArticleTraffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Glucagon Secretory Granule Dynamics.
Article in Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress-driven remodeling of antigen presentation and chemokine signaling in pancreatic β-cells: implications for type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal Analysis of Glucagon Secretory Granule Dynamics.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The secretion of insulin and glucagon by pancreatic β and α cells, respectively, is critical for glucose homeostasis. While the insulin granule dynamics are well-characterized, the intracellular behavior of glucagon secretory granules (GSG) remains poorly understood. Here, we analyze the mobility of GSGs in αTC1-9 cells and insulin secretory granules (ISG) in INS-1E cells using spatiotemporal correlation spectroscopy and single-particle tracking (SPT), with a focus on the role of the cytoskeleton in regulating their transport. Under basal conditions, SPT classification reveals that GSGs predominantly exhibit diffusive motion (57.6% ± 10%), with smaller fractions categorized as almost immobile (35.8% ± 10.6%) or drifted (6.6% ± 3%), closely resembling ISG dynamics. By disrupting microtubules, we confirmed their role as active tracks for directed granule transport in both cell types. Upon exposure to their respective secretory stimuli-high glucose for β cells and low glucose for α cells-both granule populations underwent a comparable shift toward increased diffusive and drifted motions. Treatment with the actin depolymerizing agent Latrunculin-B reproduced this stimulatory effect in INS-1E cells but not in αTC1-9 cells, suggesting that despite their overall similarity in granule behavior under physiological conditions, α and β cells may rely on partially distinct mechanisms to engage the cytoskeletal network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.