Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988462›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026

Annual 12-Week Dosing Gap of Natalizumab: Clinical Efficacy, Blood Biomarkers, and CSF Cell Composition.

Regina Berkovich, Tilman Schneider-Hohendorf, Eric Baetscher, Evan L Riddle, Marie Deffner, Emily Katsnelson, Janine Ferrant-Orgettas, Julie Czerkowicz, John Anderson, Susan E Goelz and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04048577 (The Impact of a Planned 12-week Dosing Interruption of Natalizumab on Immune Cell Trafficking, Pharmacokinetic), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04048577 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

The Impact of a Planned 12-week Dosing Interruption of Natalizumab on Immune Cell Trafficking, Pharmacokinetic (PK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) Parameters, and Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Disease Stability.

TypeinterventionalSponsorBerkovich, Regina MD, PhD Inc.Ran2019 to 2021Enrolled10ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsDosing Interruption of Natalizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital signatures of fatigue and wearing-off symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis under natalizumab.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Regina BerkovichBerkovich MS Center and Research Institute, West Hollywood, California, USA.
Tilman Schneider-HohendorfDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3717-5176
Eric BaetscherAdvanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1532-1328
Evan L RiddleBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Marie DeffnerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Emily KatsnelsonBerkovich MS Center and Research Institute, West Hollywood, California, USA.
Janine Ferrant-OrgettasBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Julie CzerkowiczBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
John AndersonBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan E GoelzBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicholas SchwabDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5494-9885

Funding

Biogen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNatalizumab (NTZ) is a highly effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS); however, its use is limited by the risk of a rare potentially severe opportunistic brain infection, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Alternative dosing strategies are evaluated to reduce PML risk while still maintaining efficacy, which include extending the dosing interval (EID) or a lesser-known annual dosing gap (aGAP), which is the focus of this prospective observational single-site cohort study. We evaluated whether aGAP affects the efficacy of NTZ, which biomarkers could be useful for a personalized dosing strategy, and potential cellular mechanisms that might contribute to reducing the risk of PML during aGAP.

methodsClinical assessments, quantifications of NTZ, neurofilament light chain (NfL), and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) were performed for ten study participants of a clinical trial (NCT04048577); CSF single-cell RNA-sequencing data from nine participants (15 samples) were analyzed together with 48 healthy and 35 MS controls.

resultsAlthough NTZ serum levels were decreased below EID levels and sVCAM-1 levels were increased, aGAP was not associated with MS activity as measured by EDSS and MRI. After aGAP, while CSF cell counts remained stable, the CSF immune cell composition changed and NfL values were increased 3 months post gap. CSF proportions of CD4, CD8, and natural killer cell subsets increased towards levels of untreated MS patients, while B-cell proportions remained unchanged.

interpretationThe differential CSF composition associated with sVCAM-1 serum level changes suggests that selective immune cell trafficking may occur during aGAP, potentially contributing to PML prevention.

Indexed as

Immunologic FactorsLeukoencephalopathy, Progressive MultifocalMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNatalizumabAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurofilament ProteinsProspective StudiesVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1BiomarkersImmunologic FactorsNatalizumabneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1alternative dosingmultiple sclerosisnatalizumabpersonalized medicineprogressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID40988462
PMCPMC12790166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.