ReviewElectrophoresis2025
Microfluidic- and Field-Assisted 3D Printing: Leveraging Fluidic Control, Electrokinetic Phenomena, and Other Physical Fields to Advance Additive Manufacturing.
Review in Electrophoresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integrating Optical Feedback Alignment and Fluidic Control for Multiphase Flow-Assisted In Situ 3D Printing.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Microfluidic- and Field-Assisted 3D Printing: Leveraging Fluidic Control, Electrokinetic Phenomena, and Other Physical Fields to Advance Additive Manufacturing.Electrophoresis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has revolutionized manufacturing by enabling the rapid fabrication of complex structures, yet conventional 3D techniques remain constrained by inherent limitations in resolution, speed, and multi-material integration. To address these challenges, emerging approaches such as microfluidic-assisted and field-assisted additive manufacturing have been developed to enhance the capabilities and versatility of the method. Microfluidic-assisted 3D printing leverages controlled flow patterns for material deposition and control, material gradient formation, and advanced polymerization processes. Field-assisted methods, including electric-, acoustic-, and interface-assisted approaches, directly manipulate materials during printing to enable advanced functionalities and material properties. This review summarizes the latest advancements in microfluidic- and field-assisted 3D printing, highlighting their unique advantage in overcoming current 3D printing limitations and their potential to drive innovation in applications ranging from biomedical devices to functional materials development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.