Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988417›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

From Being Moved to Being Still: Kama Muta Reduces Postural Sway Velocity.

Maria Meisel, Philipp Hofmann, Petra Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria MeiselFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5315-2645
Philipp HofmannFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-9707
Petra JansenFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-2158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGrounded in embodiment theory, this exploratory study examines whether kama muta (as being moved/touched) elicits measurable changes in postural sway (subtle body movement even during stillness) reflecting an emotional-motor connection.

methodsData were collected from 87 university students (aged 18-43 years, M = 22.22, SD = 3.20). Participants viewed six video clips (kama muta and neutral condition) while standing on a force plate that recorded their postural sway. After each video, participants rated their feelings of being moved on a 5-point Likert scale.

resultsKama muta was associated with a significant reduction in sway velocity compared to the neutral condition (p = 0.003), with no significant differences in mean amplitude (p = 0.31). Sway velocity and amplitude decreased significantly in the second half of the kama muta condition (p < 0.001), indicating intensification of the emotional effect. No significant correlations emerged between self-reported emotional ratings and sway metrics (p > 0.05).

conclusionFindings indicate a possible stabilizing effect of kama muta on postural control, promoting physical grounding during emotional experiences. While the homogeneous sample limits generalizability, these results enhance our understanding of emotional embodiment and suggest potential applications for fostering emotional and social connection. Future research should explore these mechanisms by including comprehensive emotion assessments and additional measures to identify muscular activation patterns.

Indexed as

EmotionsPostural BalanceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung Adultemotional embodimentkama mutamotor controlpostural sway

Identifiers

PMID40988417
PMCPMC12457727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.