Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988099›Full record

SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2025

Evaluating the Rates of Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Among GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Jimmy Wen, Denise Nadora, Ethan Bernstein, Christiane How-Volkman, Alina Truong, Bethany Joy, Megan Kou, Zohaer Muttalib, Arsh Alam, Eldo Frezza

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy and Glucose Metabolism: The Good, the Bad and the Unsightly.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jimmy WenCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5412-8551
Denise NadoraCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Ethan BernsteinCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7510-2246
Christiane How-VolkmanCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Alina TruongCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Bethany JoyCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Megan KouCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Zohaer MuttalibCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Arsh AlamUniversity of California, Davis, California, USA.
Eldo FrezzaCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis meta-analysis evaluates the rates of pancreatitis/pancreatic cancer among glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for GLP-1 RA RCTs that evaluated pancreatitis/pancreatic cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate this risk; subgroup analysis was performed with and without background medications.

results62 studies utilising dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, beinaglutide, retatrutide, or tirzepatide, with 66,232 patients, mean age of 58.3 years (14.4 to 68), and mean follow-up of 43.5 weeks (1 to 198) were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed a significantly increased risk of pancreatitis (RR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.09-1.89, p = 0.009), but not when stratified by background medications (RR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.87-1.87) and without background medications (RR: 1.37, 95% CI 0.91-2.05). Pancreatic cancer and GLP-1 RA use showed no significant association (RR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.86-1.97). However, a significant increase was found with background medications (RR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.05-3.26, p = 0.03), but not without (RR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.43-1.55).

conclusionGLP-1 RAs carry a slightly increased risk of pancreatitis, which is not significant when stratified by background medication use. Overall risk for pancreatic cancer was not observed, but a slight association was found when stratified with background medications. However, this difference is likely minimal, given the numerous studies excluded from the meta-analysis where both treatment arms had zero events.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsGLP‐1 RApancreatic cancerpancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID40988099
PMCPMC12457091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.