Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988081›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Brief admission by self-referral for adolescents who self-harm: discourses on involvement and responsibility among parents and other significant adults.

Reid Lantto, Kajsa Landgren, Sophia Eberhard, Björn Axel Johansson, Olof Rask, Sofie Westling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Brief user-controlled admission (BUCA) in psychiatric care.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reid LanttoPsychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. reid.lantto@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0491-9351
Kajsa LandgrenPsychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sophia EberhardDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Björn Axel JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Olof RaskDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sofie WestlingPsychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrief Admission by self-referral (BA) was implemented in 2018 in Swedish child and adolescent psychiatric (CAP) inpatient care. This intervention empowers adolescents to self-admit at their own request for brief periods to prevent self-harm and suicidal crisis. As BA enhances healthcare user autonomy, it is a timely intervention to consider with the emerging human rights discourse and rising imperatives for person-centered care in psychiatry. The present study explores talk about adolescents access to BA specifically in terms of involvement and responsibilities of parents and other significant adults in CAP.

methodsIn this qualitative study, we interviewed 26 significant adults (the majority being biological parents) of children with access to BA. Interviews were semi-structured, asking broadly about participants' experiences with BA. We used reflexive thematic analysis from a social constructionist framework to explore how participants' narratives drew on existing psychiatric discourses.

resultsWe constructed four themes around narratives of involvement and responsibilities in BA specifically and CAP generally: there's no need to be involved in BA, selflessly supporting child involvement, being insufficiently involved, and being left to shoulder everything. These themes illustrate a sliding scale from perceiving little responsibility nor need for involvement, to perceiving shared responsibility for children's well-being but limited personal rights, to being under-involved and even perceptions of being left with sole responsibility as CAP refused to provide care.

conclusionsParticipants' narratives could generally be mapped onto rights-based discourse, emphasizing that adolescents should have access to BA as it helped them care for themselves. As participants took various positions regarding the responsibility of parents versus CAP to protect and help adolescents, the risk of perpetually downplaying the needs of parents and other significant adults became apparent, along with the pitfalls of neoliberal healthcare management and responsibilization of child mental health. CAP ought to systematically inform both adolescents and significant adults about BA, strengthening mental health literacy among the target population. It also ought to be emphasized that supporting significant others is considered part of the purpose with BA.

Indexed as

Brief admissionDiscoursesHuman rightsInvolvementParentsPerson-centered careQualitativeResponsibilitySelf-admissionSelf-harm

Identifiers

PMID40988081
PMCPMC12455832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.