Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988013›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evaluation of Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) with guided self-help CBT as a treatment option - a protocol of a single-blind randomized multicenter trial (KAIROS).

Anneli Farnsworth von Cederwald, Sigrid Salomonsson, Nils Hentati Isacsson, Viktor Kaldo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04900064 (Evaluation of Primary Care Behavioral Health), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04900064 narecruitingnot on this map

Evaluation of Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) With the Addition of Self-help CBT - A Randomized Multicenter Trial for Superiority and Non-superiority Comparisons of Effects on Patients' Everyday Function, Symptoms, and Experiences

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinnaeus UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled1,242ConditionsPanic Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, Depression, HypochondriasisArmsBrief interventions, Self-help CBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anneli Farnsworth von CederwaldDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden. anneli.farnsworthvoncederwald@lnu.se.
Sigrid SalomonssonCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nils Hentati IsacssonCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Viktor KaldoDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile protocol-based psychological treatments have significantly advanced mental health care, real-world accessibility remains a challenge. Primary care, the main provider of mental health services, faces barriers such as limited resources and a diverse patient population with varying needs, making it difficult to rely solely on time-intensive, protocolized treatments. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model promotes brief, flexible interventions that may better accommodate these needs. However, limited research on these interventions raises concerns about potential undertreatment. To align with Universal Health Coverage principles, it is essential to identify which patient groups benefit most from resource-efficient protocol-based versus brief, flexible, and individualized treatments. Our main aim is to evaluate whether a integrating guided self-help into PCBH improves outcomes compared to the core PCBH model, as well as to assess whether patients identified as suitable for protocol-based interventions benefit more from the combined model.

methodsPatients seeking help for mental or behavioral health problems at PCBH primary care centers will be randomized to one of two arms: core PCBH, where patients receive a contextual assessment and brief interventions tailored to their needs, or an extended PCBH model, where a diagnostic assessment determines whether patients receive brief interventions or guided self-help. The primary outcome is functional impairment, assessed at baseline and followed up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (primary endpoint), as well as at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include symptom change, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors. DISCUSSION: The study design allows for comparisons of patient outcomes between the two care models, with a primary focus on evaluating superiority and a secondary focus on non-inferiority, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors. Overall, the project seeks to advance understanding of effective mental health interventions in primary care settings and inform decision-making regarding treatment approaches.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04900064. Registered on May 25th, 2021. Registered with the Swedish Ethical Review Board (2020-04198) on October 12th, 2020. This protocol was submitted for publication on March 18th, 2025, prior to the inclusion of the final participant, and will shortly thereafter, without any changes, be made publicly available as a preprint in an open-access repository.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMental DisordersPrimary Health CareSelf CareAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodCBTCognitive behavioral therapyGSHGuided self-helpPCBHPrimary carePrimary care behavioral health

Identifiers

PMID40988013
PMCPMC12455819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.