ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Refining the Classroom: The Self-Supervised Professor Model for Improved Segmentation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with accurate staging being critical for treatment planning. Automated 3D segmentation models can aid in staging, but segmenting PDAC, especially in cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), is challenging due to the tumor's heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration. This study developed and evaluated a tripartite self-supervised learning architecture for improved 3D segmentation of LAPC, addressing the challenges of heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration in PDAC. We implemented a tripartite architecture consisting of a teacher model, a professor model, and a student model. The teacher model, trained on manually segmented CT scans, generated initial pseudo-segmentations. The professor model refined these segmentations, which were then used to train the student model. We utilized 1115 CT scans from 903 patients for training. Three expert abdominal radiologists manually segmented 30 CT scans from 27 patients with LAPC, serving as reference standards. We evaluated the performance using DICE, Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD). The teacher, professor, and student models achieved average DICE scores of 0.60, 0.73, and 0.75, respectively, with significant boundary accuracy improvements (teacher HD95/MSD, 25.71/5.96 mm; professor, 9.68/1.96 mm; student, 4.79/1.34 mm). Our findings demonstrate that the professor model significantly enhances segmentation accuracy for LAPC (p < 0.01). Both the professor and student models offer substantial improvements over previous work. The introduced tripartite self-supervised learning architecture shows promise for improving automated 3D segmentation of LAPC, potentially aiding in more accurate staging and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.