Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987960›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Refining the Classroom: The Self-Supervised Professor Model for Improved Segmentation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Jacqueline I Bereska, Selina Palic, Leonard F Bereska, Efstratios Gavves, C Yung Nio, Marnix P M Kop, Femke Struik, Freek Daams, Martijn A van Dam, Tom Dijkhuis and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jacqueline I BereskaCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. j.i.bereska@amsterdamUMC.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2491-5833
Selina PalicCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Leonard F BereskaVideo and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Efstratios GavvesVideo and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C Yung NioDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marnix P M KopDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Femke StruikDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Freek DaamsCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn A van DamDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Tom DijkhuisDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jaap StokerCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Inez M VerpalenCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. i.m.verpalen@amsterdamUMC.nl.
Pancreatobiliary and Hepatic Artificial Intelligence Research (PHAIR) consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with accurate staging being critical for treatment planning. Automated 3D segmentation models can aid in staging, but segmenting PDAC, especially in cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), is challenging due to the tumor's heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration. This study developed and evaluated a tripartite self-supervised learning architecture for improved 3D segmentation of LAPC, addressing the challenges of heterogeneous appearance, irregular shapes, and extensive infiltration in PDAC. We implemented a tripartite architecture consisting of a teacher model, a professor model, and a student model. The teacher model, trained on manually segmented CT scans, generated initial pseudo-segmentations. The professor model refined these segmentations, which were then used to train the student model. We utilized 1115 CT scans from 903 patients for training. Three expert abdominal radiologists manually segmented 30 CT scans from 27 patients with LAPC, serving as reference standards. We evaluated the performance using DICE, Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD). The teacher, professor, and student models achieved average DICE scores of 0.60, 0.73, and 0.75, respectively, with significant boundary accuracy improvements (teacher HD95/MSD, 25.71/5.96 mm; professor, 9.68/1.96 mm; student, 4.79/1.34 mm). Our findings demonstrate that the professor model significantly enhances segmentation accuracy for LAPC (p < 0.01). Both the professor and student models offer substantial improvements over previous work. The introduced tripartite self-supervised learning architecture shows promise for improving automated 3D segmentation of LAPC, potentially aiding in more accurate staging and treatment planning.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalImaging, Three-DimensionalPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansArtificial intelligenceCarcinomaDeep learningPancreatic ductalPancreatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40987960
PMCPMC13230426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.