Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987945›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Prediction of Clinically Significant Improvements During the Interdisciplinary Intensive Outpatient Program for Traumatic Brain Injury Using Machine Learning.

Rujirutana Srikanchana, David Samuel, Jacob Powell, Treven Pickett, Thomas DeGraba, Chandler Sours Rhodes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rujirutana SrikanchanaNational Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. rujirutana.srikanchana.civ@health.mil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-7137
David SamuelNational Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jacob PowellNational Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-9433
Treven PickettNational Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5829-1162
Thomas DeGrabaNational Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-7301
Chandler Sours RhodesNational Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-8835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this research was to assess the potential for machine learning to predict clinically significant patient improvement during a four-week interdisciplinary Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE).

methodsAssessment of brain injury characterization and outcomes were measured in 790 active duty service members at the NICoE, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda Maryland. Demographic and self-reported measures of posttraumatic stress, depression, anxiety, post-concussion symptoms, and sleep were assessed upon admission. Total scores and symptom cluster scores for self-report measures were calculated. Clinically significant improvement from pre- to post NICoE IOP was operationally defined as clinically significant changes in posttraumatic stress and post-concussion symptoms. Two datasets were created: one including demographics and total scores on self-report measures and one including demographics, total scores, and symptom cluster scores for relevant self-report measures. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained to predict group identification (clinically significant improvement vs. not significant improvement), where a binary logistic objective function is used to minimize the log loss between the predicted probabilities. Model performance and feature ranking were then evaluated on test datasets.

resultsThe performance and feature importance of two models to predict group identification were evaluated, where the model including only demographics and total self-report measures performed with an AUC of 75% with the accuracy of 68%, compared to the model incorporating demographics and symptom cluster measures improved the AUC to 79% with 72% accuracy. The top five features contributing to the model with symptom clusters included the posttraumatic stress arousal, avoidance, and reexperiencing sub-scores, education, and postconcussive symptoms cognitive sub-score.

conclusionUtilization of the XGBoost models demonstrated acceptable discrimination for determining key factors associated with clinically significant improvement for SMs following participation in an interdisciplinary IOP using demographics and self-report measures. Severity of posttraumatic stress symptoms upon admission was the greatest predictors of clinically significant improvement in this model of care. Incorporating ML algorithms into clinical care is a precision medicine approach that may accurately predict treatment efficacy leading to improved healthcare resource allocation and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelOutpatientsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticClinical outcomesConcussionMachine learningMilitaryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.