ArticleBrain informatics2025
A hybrid neuromarketing approach exploiting EEG graph signal processing and gaze dynamic patterning.
Article in Brain informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we propose a hybrid decoding scheme for classifying consumer intent in a binary decision-making scenario ("Buy" vs. "NoBuy"), using simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and eye-tracking data. The proposed framework integrates graph signal processing-based features derived from EEG functional connectivity with descriptive statistics from eye movement patterns. Given the imbalanced nature of the targeted classification task, the performance of the proposed hybrid scheme is being assessed at the individual subject level via the employment of Cohen's kappa and F1-score metrics, both of which are well-suited for handling class imbalance by accounting for agreement beyond chance and balancing precision and recall, respectively. The reported results showcase the superiority of the proposed hybrid decoding scheme, as the averaged scores for both Cohen's kappa and F1-score are exceeding (with statistical significance at 0.05) the presented competing approaches by 0.08-0.30 and 0.06-0.23 respectively. Additionally, our connectivity analysis confirmed two key findings: (i) strong couplings were consistently observed between electrodes spanning distinct brain regions, such as the prefrontal and occipital cortices, in addition to the commonly reported frontal dipoles; and (ii) the most salient functional connections varied across individuals, with only a limited subset shared among subjects. These results highlight the potential of multimodal decoding approaches and subject-specific connectivity patterns in advancing the classification of consumer decision behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.