Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987924›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2025

Religiousness Measured by the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale (4-BDRS) among Polish Believers: Measurement Quality, Personality and Well-being Correlates.

Piotr Szydłowski, Ewa Topolewska-Siedzik, Jan Cieciuch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Piotr SzydłowskiInstitute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Ul. Wóycickiego 1/3 Bud. 14, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland. p.szydlowski@uksw.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-7774
Ewa Topolewska-SiedzikInstitute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Ul. Wóycickiego 1/3 Bud. 14, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-7469
Jan CieciuchInstitute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Ul. Wóycickiego 1/3 Bud. 14, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2291-8301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale (4-BDRS) was developed within the framework of cross-cultural psychology to measure four universal dimensions of religiousness: believing, bonding, belonging, and behaving. This paper presents the Polish version of the 4-BDRS and reports two studies that examined its measurement quality and the personality and well-being correlates of these dimensions. The scale has demonstrated satisfactory reliability and factorial validity. All dimensions showed theoretically consistent associations with the other measures of religiousness. No significant gender differences (or only weak effects) were found across the four dimensions, whereas the scale scores significantly increased with age. All dimensions were positively related to the personality traits associated with socialization (stability). Moreover, all the dimensions showed a positive association with well-being. Belonging and bonding were more strongly related to well-being than believing and behaving. Specifically, belonging was the most crucial dimension for general and social well-being, whereas bonding was the most important dimension for emotional and psychological well-being. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonal SatisfactionReligion and PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult4-BDRSPersonalityReligiousnessWell-being

Identifiers

PMID40987924
PMCPMC12518467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.