Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987837›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025

When external factors limit care options for complex fetal and neonatal diagnoses.

DonnaMaria E Cortezzo, Ashley Waddell Tingstad, Terri L Major-Kincade, April R Dworetz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

DonnaMaria E CortezzoDivision of Neonatology, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT, USA. dcortezzo@connecticutchildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7555-7829
Ashley Waddell TingstadTreetown Law PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Terri L Major-KincadeDivision of Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care-Support Medicine, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8977-9121
April R DworetzDivision of Neonatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9628-3399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year in the United States, many individuals receive a complex fetal or neonatal diagnosis. Amidst grief and processing, they are faced with making difficult and multifaceted medical decisions for the pregnancy and, at times, neonatal care. Care options often include abortion, fetal interventions, palliative and hospice care, and invasive neonatal interventions. These incredibly personal resolutions about the most appropriate care path are often based on multiple influences beyond the medical information and prognosis. External factors (geography, finances, provider bias, institutional policies, and legislation) may limit the availability of certain care options patients would prefer. This article explores how each of these external factors may limit the choices of abortion, fetal interventions, palliative and hospice care, and invasive neonatal interventions for patients facing a complex fetal or neonatal diagnosis. Further, it discusses the implications of restricted options and suggests strategies to continue to provide complete, comprehensive counseling and care.

Identifiers

PMID40987837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.