ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
When external factors limit care options for complex fetal and neonatal diagnoses.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Each year in the United States, many individuals receive a complex fetal or neonatal diagnosis. Amidst grief and processing, they are faced with making difficult and multifaceted medical decisions for the pregnancy and, at times, neonatal care. Care options often include abortion, fetal interventions, palliative and hospice care, and invasive neonatal interventions. These incredibly personal resolutions about the most appropriate care path are often based on multiple influences beyond the medical information and prognosis. External factors (geography, finances, provider bias, institutional policies, and legislation) may limit the availability of certain care options patients would prefer. This article explores how each of these external factors may limit the choices of abortion, fetal interventions, palliative and hospice care, and invasive neonatal interventions for patients facing a complex fetal or neonatal diagnosis. Further, it discusses the implications of restricted options and suggests strategies to continue to provide complete, comprehensive counseling and care.
Identifiers
40987837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.