Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using eye movements, electrodermal activities, and heart rates to predict different types of cognitive load during reading with background music.

Ying Que, Yueyuan Zheng, Janet H Hsiao, Xiao Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying QueFaculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yueyuan ZhengDivision of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Janet H HsiaoDivision of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Xiao HuFaculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. xiaohu@arizona.edu.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61703357Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong S.A.R., China 17607018Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong S.A.R., China 17608621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The triarchic model of cognitive load postulates three types of cognitive load-extraneous, intrinsic, and germane load. While various approaches have been proposed to measure the three types of cognitive load, most measurements are intrusive. To address this issue, we leveraged multimodal learning analytics to collect eye movement (EM), electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV) from non-intrusive sensors and investigate whether they could predict the three types of cognitive load. We examined extraneous load (created by adding background music (BGM)), intrinsic load (created by text complexity), and germane load (reflected by comprehension accuracy) in a novel reading context with self-selected preferred BGM. One hundred and two (102) non-native English speakers were recruited. Half of them read English passages with BGM, while the other half read in silence. Results of logistic regression indicated that EM measures were predictive of the three load types, while HR/HRV measures predicted extraneous and germane load. Our findings provide evidence supporting the triarchic structure of cognitive load theory and implications for the design of non-intrusive measurement of cognitive load.

Indexed as

CognitionEye MovementsGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateMusicReadingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBackground musicCognitive loadElectrodermal activityEye movementHeart rateReading comprehension

Identifiers

PMID40987831
PMCPMC12457608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.