ArticleScientific reports2025
Using eye movements, electrodermal activities, and heart rates to predict different types of cognitive load during reading with background music.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Physiological Metrics for Cognitive Load Assessment in Training and Operational Contexts: Signal Processing, Evidence, and Feasibility.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring how textual complexity affects cognitive load during reading: an eye-tracking study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Study protocol for PIANo-1: Personalized Investigation of music's effect on Attention in a series of N-of-1 trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The triarchic model of cognitive load postulates three types of cognitive load-extraneous, intrinsic, and germane load. While various approaches have been proposed to measure the three types of cognitive load, most measurements are intrusive. To address this issue, we leveraged multimodal learning analytics to collect eye movement (EM), electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV) from non-intrusive sensors and investigate whether they could predict the three types of cognitive load. We examined extraneous load (created by adding background music (BGM)), intrinsic load (created by text complexity), and germane load (reflected by comprehension accuracy) in a novel reading context with self-selected preferred BGM. One hundred and two (102) non-native English speakers were recruited. Half of them read English passages with BGM, while the other half read in silence. Results of logistic regression indicated that EM measures were predictive of the three load types, while HR/HRV measures predicted extraneous and germane load. Our findings provide evidence supporting the triarchic structure of cognitive load theory and implications for the design of non-intrusive measurement of cognitive load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.