Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Population-specific calibration and validation of an open-source bone age AI.

Sebastian Rassmann, Luka Abashishvili, Elene Melikidze, Anastasia Sukhiashvili, Megi Lartsuliani, Ivane Chkhaidze, Nino Tskhvediani, Tinatin Gordeziani, Ekaterine Kvaratskhelia, Nino Kheladze and 7 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sebastian RassmannInstitute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Luka AbashishviliDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Elene MelikidzeDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Anastasia SukhiashviliDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Megi LartsulianiDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ivane ChkhaidzeDepartment of Pediatrics, M. Iashvili Children's Central Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Nino TskhvedianiDepartment of Physics, Biophysics, Biomechanics and Informational Technologies, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Tinatin GordezianiDepartment of Endocrinology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ekaterine KvaratskheliaDepartment of Endocrinology, David Metreveli Medical Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Nino KheladzeEndocrine and Diabetes Centre, M. Iashvili Children's Central Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Maia RekhviashviliDepartment of Endocrinology, First Medical Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Salome RodonaiaDepartment of Radiology, David Tatishvili Medical Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Natia SukhitashviliDepartment of Radiology, MediClubGeorgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Nata UrushadzeDepartment of Radiology, Georgian-Dutch Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Peter KrawitzInstitute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tinatin TkemaladzeDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Behnam JavanmardiInstitute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. bjav@uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing skeletal maturity through bone age (BA) evaluation is crucial for monitoring children's growth and guiding treatments, such as hormonal therapy and orthopedic interventions. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been developed to automate BA assessment. However, bone growth patterns may vary by ancestry, and many AI models are trained on limited population datasets, raising concerns about their applicability to populations not included in the training process. To address this shortcoming for the case of the Georgian population, we retrospectively collected 381 pediatric hand X-rays and established a manual BA reference rating from seven local pediatric radiologists and endocrinologists. We then used a subset of 121 images to perform a sex-specific linear calibration of the open-source AI, Deeplasia, creating Deeplasia-GE. On the held-out test set (n = 260), the default version of Deeplasia achieved a mean absolute difference (MAD) of 6.57 months, which improved to 5.69 months after calibration. We observed that the default Deeplasia overestimates the BA in the Georgian cohort with a signed mean difference (SMD) of + 2.85 and + 5.35 months for females and males respectively, which after calibration is significantly reduced to -0.03 and + 0.58 months for females and males, respectively. We find that Deeplasia-GE has a smaller error than all the raters and, by design, Deeplasia-GE inherits the high test-retest reliability from Deeplasia. These findings suggest that Deeplasia-GE is a reliable AI-based BA assessment method for Georgian children.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonArtificial IntelligenceAdolescentCalibrationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceGlobal health equityHand x-raysModel calibrationOpen-SourcePediatric bone age

Identifiers

PMID40987805
PMCPMC12457598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.