Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987786›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predictive robot eyes enhance attentional guidance in cooperative human-robot interaction.

Lara Naendrup-Poell, Linda Onnasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara Naendrup-PoellPsychology of Action and Automation, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany. lara.naendrup-poell@tu-berlin.de.
Linda OnnaschPsychology of Action and Automation, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key factor in successful human-robot interaction (HRI) is the predictability of a robot's actions. Visual cues, such as eyes or arrows, can serve as directional indicators to enhance predictability, potentially improving performance and increasing trust. This study investigated the effects of predictive cues on performance, trust, and visual attention allocation in an industrial HRI setting. Using a 3 (predictive cues: abstract anthropomorphic eyes, directional arrows, no cue) × 3 (experience in three experimental blocks) mixed design, 42 participants were tasked with predicting a robot's movement target as quickly as possible. Contrary to our expectations, predictive cues did not significantly affect trust or prediction performance. However, eye-tracking revealed that participants exposed to anthropomorphic eyes identified the target earlier than those without cues. Interestingly, participant's self-reports showed infrequent use of the cues as directional guidance. Still, greater cue usage, as indicated by fixation data, was associated with faster predictions, suggesting that predictive cues, particularly anthropomorphic ones, guide visual attention and may improve efficiency. These findings highlight the nuanced role of predictive cues in HRI: even when not heavily relied on or reflected in performance, they can subtly guide attention and support interaction.

Indexed as

AttentionRoboticsAdultCuesEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleTrustVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAnthropomorphismEye-trackingHRIHuman–robot interactionIndustrial HRIPredictive cues

Identifiers

PMID40987786
PMCPMC12457686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.