ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive robot eyes enhance attentional guidance in cooperative human-robot interaction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-Awareness and Biologically Inspired Behaviour Based on Attention Mechanisms for Natural Human-Robot Interaction.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictive robot eyes shape visual attention, performance, and trust in interaction with an industrial CoBot.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key factor in successful human-robot interaction (HRI) is the predictability of a robot's actions. Visual cues, such as eyes or arrows, can serve as directional indicators to enhance predictability, potentially improving performance and increasing trust. This study investigated the effects of predictive cues on performance, trust, and visual attention allocation in an industrial HRI setting. Using a 3 (predictive cues: abstract anthropomorphic eyes, directional arrows, no cue) × 3 (experience in three experimental blocks) mixed design, 42 participants were tasked with predicting a robot's movement target as quickly as possible. Contrary to our expectations, predictive cues did not significantly affect trust or prediction performance. However, eye-tracking revealed that participants exposed to anthropomorphic eyes identified the target earlier than those without cues. Interestingly, participant's self-reports showed infrequent use of the cues as directional guidance. Still, greater cue usage, as indicated by fixation data, was associated with faster predictions, suggesting that predictive cues, particularly anthropomorphic ones, guide visual attention and may improve efficiency. These findings highlight the nuanced role of predictive cues in HRI: even when not heavily relied on or reflected in performance, they can subtly guide attention and support interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.