ArticleScientific data2025
A regional ocean database for the Coastal China Sea.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A regional ocean database for the Coastal China Sea.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to high-quality marine geophysical and biogeochemical in-situ data poses a challenge for model evaluation and parameter calibration of the Coastal China Sea (CCS). We describe a new regional ocean database for CCS (RODCCS) with original data from six repositories. The database covers the region of 116-135°E in longitude and 20-42°N in latitude, which embraces the Bohai Sea, the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea and a part of the Sea of Japan. About 3.9 million data points are collected and sorted according to variable types, including temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, silicate, nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, phosphate, Chlorophyll a, dissolved inorganic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and particulate organic carbon. These data are quality-controlled (QCed) with six QC checks and stored in a Network Common Data Format (NetCDF) file. RODCCS includes twelve NetCDF files, each with a unified structure. The database is easily accessed and of high quality after QC checks, making it suitable for a wide range of marine modelling as well as field research for the CCS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.