ArticleBMJ open2025
Social support and multifactorial predictors of perinatal depression: insights from a hospital-based cross-sectional survey in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderating effect of dysmenorrhea on the association between number of pregnancies and antenatal depression in the third trimester: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Observational
- Trajectories of Perinatal Depressive Symptoms from the Second Trimester to Three Months Postpartum and Their Dynamic Relationship with Social Support: A Prospective Cohort Study in Beijing, China.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to estimate the frequency of depression in mothers during the antepartum and postpartum periods and identify predictors of perinatal depression in the tertiary care hospital of Karachi, Pakistan.
designAnalytical cross-sectional study.
settingPublic Tertiary Care Hospital, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
participantsThe study involved 262 mothers for the assessment of frequency and predictors of perinatal depression in Pakistan.
main outcome measuresThe Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) was used as the tool to screen for depression. The data were collected through a structured questionnaire encompassing the sociodemographic factors, pregnancy and birth-related information, newborn characteristics sections, family relationship and marital status and psychosocial and psychological history. Mean and SD were computed for continuous data, whereas frequencies and percentages were determined for categorical data. Pearson χ
resultsOut of 262 enrolled mothers, 198 screened positive for depressive symptoms using EPDS with a cut-off value ≥10. The mean age of participating mothers was 27.4±5.95 years. Approximately 39.7% of the mothers were illiterate, 75% were housewives and about 42% had a family income of less than US$126. Women with access to a healthcare facility had higher odds of antepartum depression symptoms, possibly due to poor healthcare experiences during antenatal visits. Emotional support by husband reduces the odds by 45.8% while experiencing abuse increases odds by three times. Significant predictors of postpartum depression symptoms included decision-making power, which reduced the odds of postpartum depression symptoms by 72.5% and emotional support by 80%.
conclusionsThe study concluded that maternal decision-making power is a significant protective factor against postpartum depression. Strikingly, access to health facilities by the mother was associated with higher odds of antepartum depression. Other factors, including household income, husband's employment status, domestic violence, emotional support and family abuse, did not show significant associations with either antepartum or postpartum depression. These findings emphasise the importance of routine screening to identify women at risk during the perinatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.