ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025
A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholders and Workers' Views of the Impact of a Suicide Prevention Program for the Australian Construction Industry.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholders and Workers' Views of the Impact of a Suicide Prevention Program for the Australian Construction Industry.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
issue addressedIn Australia, construction workers have suicide rates twice that of other male workers. The Bluehats suicide prevention program aims to address this issue. Workplace suicide prevention programs are promising due to their potential reach and ability to address industry-specific risks. However, evidence of their effectiveness is limited.
methodsWe aimed to understand more about the impact of the program and the factors influencing successful implementation through a qualitative study that comprised interviews and open-ended survey responses from 8 construction industry stakeholders, 19 workers, and 5 Incolink service delivery staff. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
resultsParticipants commented on the role of the Bluehats themselves, the scope of the Bluehats program, and industry-related factors that influenced the program's impact. Whilst participants reported positive impacts of the program, key recommendations included expanding the program's reach to small businesses, rural areas, and diverse cultural groups, as well as broadening its scope to include early intervention.
conclusionsThe study emphasises the importance of a supportive work environment and industry for the success of the Bluehats program. Effective suicide prevention in the construction industry requires addressing individual, social, and systemic factors through a systems-based approach. SO WHAT?: The findings suggest that although the Bluehats program has a positive impact, an enhanced reach and scope could further improve its impact. Implementing these recommendations could lead to more effective suicide prevention in the construction industry and serve as a model for similar workplace interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.