ReviewChemical reviews2025
Neural vs Neuromorphic Interfaces: Where Are We Standing?
Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organic Electrochemical Transistors for Neuromorphic Bioelectronics: Materials and Manufacturing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Foreign Body Responses to Neural Electrodes and Surface Biofunctionalization Strategies for Interface Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- PEDOT:PSS as a Bio-Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Neural Interfaces: From Molecular Design to Interfacial Intelligence.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromorphic interfaces represent a transformative frontier in neural engineering, enabling seamless communication between the nervous system and external devices through biologically inspired computing architectures. These systems offer promising avenues for diagnosing and treating neurological disorders by emulating the brain's computational strategies. Neural devices, including sensors and stimulators, monitor or modulate neural activity, playing a pivotal role in deciphering brain function and neuropathologies. Yet, clinical translation remains limited due to persistent challenges such as foreign body responses, low signal-to-noise ratios, and constraints in real-time data processing. Recent breakthroughs in neuromorphic hardware, neural recording, and stimulation technologies are addressing these challenges, paving the way for more adaptive and efficient brain-machine interfaces and neuroprosthetics. This review highlights the emerging class of neurohybrid interfaces, where neuromorphic systems might be integrated to enhance bidirectional neural communication. It emphasizes novel material strategies engineered for seamless neural interfacing and their incorporation into advanced neuromorphic chip architectures capable of real-time signal processing and closed-loop feedback. Furthermore, this review explores cutting-edge neuromorphic biointerfaces and evaluates the technological, biological, and ethical challenges involved in their clinical deployment. By bridging materials science, neuroscience, and neuromorphic engineering, these systems hold the potential to redefine the landscape of neurotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.