Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2025
Application of the 2023 Italian guidelines for respiratory support management in acute viral bronchiolitis: a retrospective study.
Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Hospitalised Bronchiolitis: A Meta-Analysis.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Pooled it
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis-Trends of Use in Norway.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the 2023 Italian guidelines on respiratory support management for acute viral bronchiolitis by comparing the use of low-flow oxygen (LFO) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapies during the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 epidemic seasons.
designA retrospective, single-centre observational study.
settingThe paediatric emergency department of Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 202 infants (<12 months) with hypoxaemia due to acute viral bronchiolitis were hospitalised during the study periods. Eight patients were excluded due to chronic conditions or missing data.
interventionsThe study compared LFO as a first-line therapy and HFNC as a second-line option in cases of LFO failure, before (2022-2023) and after (2023-2024) the guideline update.
main outcome measuresRates of LFO and HFNC use, treatment failure, intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospitalisation and oxygen therapy duration.
resultsHFNC use as a first-line therapy decreased from 43.5% to 5.5%, while LFO use increased from 56.5% to 94.5%. LFO failure rates dropped significantly from 50% to 23%. No significant changes were observed in HFNC failure rates (12.5% vs 16.7%), ICU admissions or intubation rates. The average hospital stay decreased from 5.1±2.3 to 4.1±2.0 days, with a concomitant reduction in oxygen therapy duration.
conclusionsThe 2023 Italian guidelines significantly reduced inappropriate HFNC use and hospital stay length without compromising patient outcomes. These findings support the step-up approach, emphasising LFO as the preferred first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.