ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength: 3D-Printed Composite Versus Zirconia and E-max on Feldspathic Ceramic Rods Using Two Resin Cements.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article aims to evaluate the shear bond strength of a 3D-printed composite resin compared with well-established materials (zirconia and E-max), bonded with two different resin cements: Panavia V5 and ResiCem EX. Materials and Methods: Shear bond strength was tested across six material-cement combinations: zirconia, E-max, and 3D-printed composite resin, each bonded with either Panavia V5 or ResiCem EX. A total of 24 discs were prepared from each material, with 12 specimens allocated to each group (10 tested bond strength and 2 microscopy). The bonding interfaces were examined using a digital optical microscope. Shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA. Results: The highest shear bond strength was observed in 3D-printed composite resin bonded with Panavia V5 (20.74 MPa), which was significantly higher than zirconia bonded with ResiCem EX (13.9 MPa, Conclusion: 3D-printed composite resin demonstrated superior bond strength compared with zirconia and E-max; Panavia V5 showed potential as a reliable cement for clinical applications. These findings support the growing role of 3D-printed composites in restorative dentistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.