ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Social ties drive post-fission group choice in blue monkeys.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social ties drive post-fission group choice in blue monkeys.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Permanent group fissions present rare opportunities for socially philopatric individuals to select their groupmates. We hypothesized that animals prioritize maintaining beneficial social ties during fission. We assessed post-fission group choice in philopatric adult female blue monkeys by considering the strength and consistency of their social ties, dominance relations and relatedness with female peers, as well as their risk of infanticide and ties to the original group's resident male. Using a temporal network model, we assessed which females remained together (i.e. maintained ties) after fission. Females preferentially maintained ties to individuals with whom they had consistently strong affiliative ties before fission. More closely related individuals were likely to maintain ties only if they had similar risks of infanticide. Conditional logit models showed that females vulnerable to infanticide were more likely to join the post-fission group with the original group's resident male than the group without him. Overall, female blue monkeys appear to consider multiple types of relationships when structuring their post-fission groups, prioritizing consistent affiliative ties with other females and ties with a familiar male, and even separating from kin when infant offspring are vulnerable. The relationships prioritized during fission likely confer benefits, and females' choices illuminate how sociality influences decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.