Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987321›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Extinction drives both expansion and contraction of morphological disparity in trilobites.

Diego Balseiro, Fernanda Serra, Arnaud Bignon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego BalseiroCICTERRA, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-3015-9066
Fernanda SerraCICTERRA, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-7802-3585
Arnaud BignonIndependent Researcher, Brest, Bretagne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-0761

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the many contributions of palaeontology to evolutionary biology, understanding the evolution of morphological diversity is one of the most relevant. Disparity dynamics throughout the history of a clade have been widely explored in the fossil record, mostly by comparing taxonomic and morphological diversity. However, such comparisons reflect net diversification but fail to individualize extinction and origination rates, limiting our understanding of macroevolutionary processes. Here, we analyse Cambrian-Devonian trilobite disparity by integrating morphometric data with stratigraphic ranges from the Paleobiology Database. We generate time series for taxonomic and morphological diversity, extinction and origination rates and individualize the selectivity of extinction and origination relative to morphology using logistic regression. Our results show that net diversification alone does not explain disparity trends, as major increases in trilobite morphological diversity occur during intervals of stable taxonomic diversity. However, the selectivity of extinction and origination provides key insights into the underlying trends. A modified measure of the macroevolutionary influence of extinction and origination shows how these processes interact to shape disparity, producing increases and decreases individually. Notably, extinction emerges as the main driver of morphospace expansion and contraction in trilobites, challenging the classic view of extinction as a constraining factor for morphological evolution.

Indexed as

ArthropodsBiological EvolutionExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsBiodiversityFossilsdisparityextinctionmacroevolutionmacroevolutionary influencemorphological diversificationtrilobites

Identifiers

PMID40987321
PMCPMC12457022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.