ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Ultrasound-mediated fabrication of chickpea protein nanoparticles for stabilizing Pickering emulsions.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidics-engineered ovalbumin-carvacrol nanoparticles for ultrasonically fabricated pickering emulsion coatings: a sonochemical strategy for fruit preservation.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- High Removal Rates and Atomically Smooth Surfaces Are Achieved on Silicon Wafers Using the New SiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Combined Ultrasound and NaHCOFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the influences of ultrasound-assisted glycosylated modification on chickpea protein isolate: insights into structural, functional, and interfacial properties.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Integrated proteomics and metabolomics revealed the influence of ultrasonic cavitation effects on the physicochemical properties and metabolic components during Lactobacillus gasseri JM1 fermentation in soymilk.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research investigated the impacts of various ultrasonic power (0, 150 W, 300 W, 450 W, 600 W) treatments on chickpea protein isolate (CPI) and their ability to stabilize Pickering emulsions. Ultrasonication initially reduced particle size before causing subsequent increase, with the smallest nanoparticles (150.13 ± 0.94 nm) achieved at 450 W, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. Structural characterization demonstrated that α-helix content initially increased then decreased, while β-sheet content showed the opposite trend. Similarly, absolute zeta potential values, intrinsic fluorescence intensity, and surface hydrophobicity all exhibited initial increases followed by subsequent decreases upon ultrasound treatment. At 450 W, nanoparticles improved emulsion stability, decreasing droplet size by 18.96 % and increasing absolute zeta potential to 50.53 ± 0.35 mV (p < 0.05). The emulsification activity index (26.67 ± 0.19 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.