Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987051›Full record

ArticleCognition2026

Planning to be incremental: Scene descriptions reveal meaningful clustering in language production.

Karina Tachihara, Madison Barker, Beverly Cotter, Taylor Hayes, John Henderson, Adrian Zhou, Fernanda Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karina TachiharaDepartment of Linguistics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 707 S. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 603 East Daniel St., Champaign, IL 61820, United States. Electronic address: karinat@illinois.edu.
Madison BarkerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis 135 Young Hall, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, United States. Electronic address: msbarker@ucdavis.edu.
Beverly CotterDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis 135 Young Hall, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, United States. Electronic address: btcotter@ucdavis.edu.
Taylor HayesCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA 95618, United States. Electronic address: trhayes@ucdavis.edu.
John HendersonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis 135 Young Hall, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, United States; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA 95618, United States. Electronic address: johnhenderson@ucdavis.edu.
Adrian ZhouDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis 135 Young Hall, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, United States. Electronic address: adrzhou@ucdavis.edu.
Fernanda FerreiraDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis 135 Young Hall, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, United States; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA 95618, United States. Electronic address: fferreira@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Multi-Utterance Language ProductionR01HD100516 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FERREIRA, FERNANDA · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do speakers plan complex descriptions and then execute those plans? In this work, we attempt to answer this question by asking subjects to describe complex visual scenes. We posit that speakers begin planning by organizing the scene into meaningful clusters or groupings of objects. Speakers describe the scene cluster by cluster, allowing for some planning time between each cluster. To test these ideas, in a preregistered study 30 participants described 30 indoor and outdoor scenes while their speech was recorded. Physical distance was calculated by identifying the centroid point of each object and then computing the Euclidean distance between centroid points for every object pair. Semantic distance was calculated using ConceptNet Numberbatch to obtain the semantic similarity between object labels. A clustering algorithm was then applied to establish the appropriate number of clusters per scene and to assign objects to each cluster. We observed that, consistent with our hypothesis, objects separated by shorter physical distances and objects that are semantically more similar were discussed in closer temporal proximity in the verbal descriptions. In addition, word productions that involved jumping from one cluster to another took longer to initiate than those associated with the same cluster. We conclude that speakers address the linearization problem by establishing clusters of objects and using them to facilitate incremental planning. This approach treats multiutterance language production as a type of foraging behavior, where people balance exploration and exploitation.

Indexed as

LanguageSpeechAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleSemanticsYoung AdultClusteringLinearizationMultiutterance productionScene description

Identifiers

PMID40987051
PMCPMC12994004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.