ArticleInternational journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology2025
Accurate 3D reconstruction of eardrum perforations using Structure from Motion photogrammetry.
Article in International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objective3D reconstruction of the ear canal and eardrum perforations of known dimensions using routine endoscopy and the computer vision algorithm Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry.
methodsThirteen 3D-printed ear models were created featuring anterior-inferior perforations (ranging 0.7-4.0 mm). One human patient was also included in data collection. A 3.0 mm 0° rigid endoscope connected to a high-definition camera captured endoscopic videos of eardrum perforations. Optical calibration included a chessboard target in coordination with a reference cylinder placed on the concha cavum. Endoscopy was performed to 1 mm from the eardrum, angling the endoscope 10-15° from the external canal axis. SfM photogrammetry was utilized to generate 3D point clouds for perforation measurements. High-resolution microCT scans (12-μm slice thickness) and 3D printed models served as ground-truths to compare against corresponding SfM eardrum reconstructions.
resultsThe average absolute difference between microCT and SfM measurements were 0.09 mm with a percentage error value < 11 % amongst the thirteen 3D printed specimens. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated no bias between large and small perforations. In the live patient, 3D reconstruction measurements (1.87 mm length, 1.41 mm width) deviated approximately 6 % from manual ruler measurements of 2.0 mm and 1.5 mm.
conclusionThis pilot study demonstrates that SfM can generate highly accurate 3D reconstructions of eardrum perforations of varying sizes in 3D-printed models and one human subject. The promising ability to reconstruct live intraoperative patient data highlights its clinical viability, particularly for adding objective measurements to clinical exam, surgical planning, and potentially patient-specific graft design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.