GuidelineDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025
Revised guideline for central nervous system oxygen toxicity exposure limits when using an inspired PO2 of 1.3 atmospheres.
Guideline in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heliox versus trimix in closed-circuit rebreather diving: A comparative study of pulmonary and decompression stress in male divers.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- The effect of hyperoxic environment on lung function and myopisation in an extended closed-circuit rebreather diving expedition.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2026Article
- A gradient-based optimization model for predicting decompression sickness risk.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technical and scientific divers breathing gases delivering hyperbaric pressures of inspired oxygen may be at risk of developing cerebral oxygen toxicity which can manifest as a seizure with little or no warning. The principle preventative strategy is adherence to time limits based on inspired PO₂ levels promulgated in 1991. These limits had their origins in US Navy studies of exposures to higher inspired PO₂s than are typically utilised by modern divers. Indeed, the duration limits for inspired PO₂s in the range typically utilised by technical divers (≤ 1.3-1.4 atm) have relatively little experimental provenance. Contemporary technical dives often involve decompression durations that result in breaches of these limits, and anecdotally, this common occurrence seems associated with a low risk of cerebral oxygen toxicity. A committee of experts recently sought experimental evidence that might support an adjustment to the recommended duration limits for typical technical dives. Such evidence exists only for an inspired PO₂ of 1.3 atm, which is a common default in use of constant PO₂ rebreather devices. The (1991) limit for a single exposure to an inspire PO₂ of 1.3 atm is 180 min with a 24-hour maximum of 210 min. Recent studies provide reassurance that dives with an inspired PO₂ of 1.3 atm consisting of up to 240 min of working dive activity followed by up to 240 min of resting decompression are associated with an acceptably low risk of cerebral oxygen toxicity. This recommendation was promulgated and endorsed at a recent workshop convened by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) involving technical and scientific divers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.