Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986867›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Analysis of the Behavioral Performance and Social Support of Patients in Online Health Communities From User Profile Perspectives: Comparative Study.

Jie Wei

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Online cancer forums and complementary and alternative medicine in cancer care: effects of ehealth literacy and psychological distress on use and attitudes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jie WeiZhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6155-1373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of online health care, an increasing number of patients are consulting and exchanging social support through online health communities. People with different diseases have varying needs for information and emotional support. However, comparisons of similarities and differences in behavioral patterns among patients with different disease types and their social support needs require further exploration.

objectiveUsing a large-scale dataset of user-generated posts, we aimed to systematically examine how disease type (acute vs chronic) influences the behavioral patterns, emotional expressions, and support-seeking needs of users in online health communities, providing actionable insights for tailored community interventions.

methodsWe identified patients with acute diseases and those with chronic diseases and then crawled corresponding user profiles and post data from the chronic disease online health community (CDOHC) and acute disease online health community (ADOHC). Using a pretrained model, we classified and described the social support performance of users. Subsequently, we conducted a comparative analysis of user behaviors, emotions, and needs by mining behavior patterns and textual content from posts. We performed further social network analysis using user profiles.

resultsWe identified 492,495 posts from 53,245 users in the CDOHC and 52,047 posts from 23,659 users in the ADOHC. Seeking and providing emotional support were higher in the CDOHC (83,231/492,495, 16.9% and 101,453/492,495, 20.6%, respectively), while seeking and providing information support were higher in the ADOHC (33,993/492,495, 22.8% and 61,128/492,495, 41.0%, respectively). These findings indicate that users with chronic diseases have a higher need for emotional support, while most users with acute diseases want to seek information support. The word co-occurrence network revealed distinct thematic patterns between the 2 communities. In the CDOHC, disease management clusters (8/17, 47%) and emotional clusters (7/17, 41%) showed balanced proportions, reflecting the dual needs of patients with chronic diseases. In contrast, in the ADOHC, posts were overwhelmingly focused on treatment (25/28, 89%), with minimal emotional vocabulary clusters (2/28, 7%). Social network analysis further highlighted these differences. The CDOHC showed the highest edge density in the seeking emotional support subnetwork and reciprocal interactions in 68.0% (83,025/122,095) of providing emotional support connections, indicating robust emotional support exchanges. Meanwhile, the ADOHC exhibited significantly faster post velocity in treatment discussions, consistent with its acute care context. These structural differences aligned with user behavior patterns. Users with chronic diseases maintained strong community bonds (averaging 8.2 connections/user), while users with acute diseases prioritized time-sensitive information (12,823/13,938, 92.0% of queries were related to treatment).

conclusionsThis study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of how disease type influences the social behaviors and emotional expressions of users. The findings provide practical implications for doctors, patients' families, and health care participants regarding targeted support strategies for patients with acute and chronic diseases.

Indexed as

InternetSocial SupportChronic DiseaseEmotionsFemaleHumansMalek-means clustersonline health communitysocial network analysissocial support behaviortext mininguser profile

Identifiers

PMID40986867
PMCPMC12504901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.