Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986864›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Clinical Utility of Early Intervention Including the 5-Step Precision Medicine Method in First-Episode Psychosis: Protocol for a Cohort Study With Nested Economic and Process Evaluations.

Jesús Pérez, David Heredero Jung, Óscar Gonzalo, Belén García Berrocal, Carmen García Cerdán, Pablo Salas Aranda, Alejandro de la Sota Pérez, Sandra Milagros Lorenzo Hernández, Elena Marcos Vadillo, Rocío García García and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jesús PérezUniversidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0740-190X
David Heredero JungInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-9319
Óscar GonzaloUniversidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-2307-0157
Belén García BerrocalInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1397-9508
Carmen García CerdánInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-4894-3410
Pablo Salas ArandaInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0005-6553-2221
Alejandro de la Sota PérezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0008-8022-5061
Sandra Milagros Lorenzo HernándezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-1685-4315
Elena Marcos VadilloInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1016-8395
Rocío García GarcíaInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-6082-5802
Vanesa Berdión MarcosInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-5130-4892
Ana Maciá CasasInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-5705
Belén Refoyo MatellánInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-3947
Berta Bote BonaecheaInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9208-6432
Llanyra García UllánInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-4935
Carolina Lorenzo RomoInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7906-0772
Carmen Martín GómezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4044-7240
Concha Turrión GómezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9351-7433
María Isidoro GarcíaInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9013-9422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotic disorders such as schizophrenia present a significant challenge to health care systems due to their high disability rates and treatment costs. With discontinuation rates for antipsychotics reaching over 40% in the first year and 80% after 3 years, it is crucial to tailor antipsychotic selection and dosing early in treatment. Personalized precision psychiatry, underpinned by pharmacogenetics, holds considerable potential in individualizing antipsychotic treatment for patients with first-episode psychosis. An internationally pioneering method called 5-step precision medicine (5SPM) focuses on the application of pharmacogenetics to clinical practice. The recently launched Prevention and Early Intervention in Mental Health (PRINT) program in Salamanca, Spain, integrates this method to enhance early intervention for adolescents and young people with first-episode psychosis.

objectiveThe Clinical Utility of Early Intervention Including the 5SPM Method in First-Episode Psychosis (CLUMP) project aims to explore whether an early intervention model of personalized precision psychiatry including pharmacogenetics improves adherence to antipsychotic medicines and, therefore, clinical and functional outcomes in young people experiencing the first episode of a psychotic illness.

methodsTo achieve our objectives, we shall compare adherence to the first prescribed antipsychotic medication and clinical and functional outcomes between patients with first-episode psychosis. We shall compare 2 cohorts: cohort 1 will receive the recently introduced PRINT program including the 5SPM method, and cohort 2 will have received standard care provided by mental health services before the PRINT program implementation. The primary outcome to measure treatment adherence will be all-cause discontinuation proportions during the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures will include pragmatic efficacy, tolerability, and functional outcome measures. For additional comparative purposes, we shall analyze the environmental, clinical, and pharmacogenetic information of patients with psychotic disorders of more than 5 years of evolution and with other mental disorders whose data are currently stored and have been ethically approved for research use. A total of 300 patients will be included in the study. Analyses will include descriptive statistics, comparison tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, multivariate log rank tests, qualitative analysis, and cost-benefit evaluation.

resultsEthics approval was obtained in June 2023. Recruitment for the CLUMP project began in January 2025, and enrollment for cohort 1 will continue until May 2026. All data collection is expected to be completed by June 2027. Data analyses are estimated to take approximately 6 months. The project is scheduled to conclude in December 2027.

conclusionsThe CLUMP project is set to provide the first clear blueprint for implementing and evaluating the impact of personalized precision psychiatry based on pharmacogenetics in the context of early intervention programs for the benefit of young people experiencing the first episode of a severe mental illness such as schizophrenia. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/74408.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsEarly Medical InterventionPrecision MedicinePsychotic DisordersAdolescentCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMalePharmacogeneticsSchizophreniaSpainYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agentsantipsychoticsearly interventionfirst-episode psychosispersonalized precision psychiatryprecision medicineschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40986864
PMCPMC12504900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.