Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986849›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Surveillance of Twitter Data on COVID-19 Symptoms During the Omicron Variant Period: A Sentiment Analysis.

Kaiyue Zhang, Zhaojin Guo, Yujie Ai, An-Ran Li, Anlin Li, Ziyu Liu, Yittie Yi Ting Tse, Xinyu Zhou, Taoran Liu, Chuxi Xiong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kaiyue Zhang *School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0002-1541-1307
Zhaojin Guo *Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, To Yuen Building, 31 To Yuen Street, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 34426956.ORCID 0009-0008-6254-0041
Yujie AiSchool of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0007-8126-2852
An-Ran LiSchool of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0004-3918-9784
Anlin LiDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, To Yuen Building, 31 To Yuen Street, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 34426956.ORCID 0009-0009-5082-8432
Ziyu LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, To Yuen Building, 31 To Yuen Street, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 34426956.ORCID 0009-0005-3081-9492
Yittie Yi Ting TseSchool of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0008-5798-2769
Xinyu ZhouSchool of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0006-0497-1279
Taoran LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, To Yuen Building, 31 To Yuen Street, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 34426956.ORCID 0000-0002-7806-1263
Chuxi XiongDepartment of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-9473-6604
Jian HuangInstitute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), ASTAR, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3931-5013
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, To Yuen Building, 31 To Yuen Street, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong), 852 34426956.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-7515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global outbreak of COVID-19 has significantly impacted health care systems and has necessitated timely access to information for effective decision-making by health care authorities. Conventional methods for collecting patient data and analyzing virus mutations are resource-intensive. In the current era of rapid internet development, information on COVID-19 infections could be collected by a novel approach that leverages social media, particularly Twitter (subsequently rebranded X). Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the trending patterns of tweets containing information about various COVID-19 symptoms, explore their synchronization and correlation with conventional monitoring data, and provide insights into the evolution of the virus. We categorized tweet sentiments to understand the predictive power of negative emotions of different symptoms in anticipating the emergence of new Omicron subvariants and offering real-time assistance to affected individuals. Methods: Relevant user tweets from 2022 containing information about COVID-19 symptoms were extracted from Twitter. Our fine-tuned RoBERTa model for sentiment analysis, achieving 99.7% accuracy for sentiment analysis, was used to categorize tweets as negative, positive, or neutral. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to examine the trends in weekly negative tweets related to COVID-19 symptoms, aligning these trends with the transition periods of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants from 2022. Real-time Twitter users with negative sentiments were geographically plotted. A total of 105,934 tweets related to fever, 120,257 to cough, 55,790 to headache, 101,220 to sore throat, 3410 to vomiting, and 5913 to diarrhea were collected. Results: The most prominent topics of discussion were fever, sore throat, and headache. The weekly average daily tweets exhibited different fluctuation patterns in different stages of subvariants. Specifically, fever-related negative tweets were more sensitive to Omicron subvariant evolution, while discussions of other symptoms declined and stabilized following the emergence of the BA.2 variant. Negative discussions about fever rose to nearly 40% at the beginning of 2022 and showed 2 distinct peaks during the absolute dominance of BA.2 and BA.5, respectively. Headache and throat-related negative sentiment exhibited the highest levels among the analyzed symptoms. Tweets containing geographic information accounted for 1.5% (1351/391,508) of all collected data, with negative sentiment users making up 0.35% (5873/391,508) of all related tweets. Conclusions: This study underscores the potential of using social media, particularly tweet trends, for real-time analysis of COVID-19 infections and has demonstrated correlations with major symptoms. The degree of negative emotions expressed in tweets is valuable in predicting the emergence of new Omicron subvariants of COVID-19 and facilitating the provision of timely assistance to affected individuals.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Social MediaHumansCOVID-19geographic trackingnatural language processingreal-time analysissentiment analysissocial media surveillanceTwittervirus mutations

Identifiers

PMID40986849
PMCPMC12456870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.