ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Acute durability of cavotricuspid isthmus block after pulsed electric field ablation: randomized comparison of two pentaspline catheter configurations (SECTION trial).
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Pulsed-field ablation for refractory typical atrial flutter resistant to multiple radiofrequency ablations: A technical report.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Efficacy, safety, and procedural outcomes of pulsed field ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Review
- Intracardiac echocardiography-derived cavotricuspid isthmus morphology score for estimating procedural complexity in typical atrial flutter.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is commonly performed alongside catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the acute efficacy of the CTI ablation using the pentaspline catheter and pulsed electric field (PEF) energy has not been systematically evaluated. This randomized study assessed the acute efficacy and extent of haemolysis associated with CTI ablation when performed using two different configurations of the pentaspline catheter. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 178 patients (age 65 ± 10 years, 66% of males) undergoing PEF ablation of the CTI in conjunction with AF ablation were randomly assigned to receive ablation using either the basket configuration (n = 95) or the flower configuration (n = 83) of the pentaspline catheter. The CTI ablation was performed before left atrial ablation. It was guided by intracardiac echocardiography, and bidirectional block was confirmed by pacing manoeuvres. Venous blood samples to assess haemolytic biomarkers were collected before and immediately after the CTI ablation. The groups were broadly comparable in baseline characteristics. The flower group demonstrated superior procedural efficiency, with fewer applications required to achieve a CTI block (3.4 ± 3.1 vs. 8.0 ± 4.1, P < 0.001), a shorter time to block (96 ± 289 vs. 177 ± 192 s, P < 0.001), and fewer total applications (10.1 ± 3.4 vs. 13.3 ± 5.1, P < 0.001). Acute reconduction occurred in 20% of cases overall, but was significantly lower in the flower group (6% vs. 32%, P < 0.001; hazard ratio: 0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.40). Haemolysis was notably lower in the flower group, with significantly less post-procedural free haemoglobin (154 ± 112 vs. 210 ± 115 mg/L, P < 0.001). One case of transient ST elevations occurred in the flower group without clinical consequence.
conclusionPulsed electric field ablation of the CTI using the flower configuration of the pentaspline catheter demonstrated higher acute efficacy in achieving CTI block and a more favourable safety profile regarding haemolysis compared to the basket configuration. This is likely due to the larger footprint and improved tissue contact of all electrodes, minimizing the leakage of PEF energy into the blood pool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.