ArticleJMIR cancer2025
Quality Assessment of Radiotherapy Health Information on Short-Form Video Platforms of TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality and reliability of osteoporosis-related health information on short-video platforms: a multi-source cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of anxiety disorder-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality, reliability, and engagement of COPD-related videos on Chinese short-form video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessing the reliability and quality of avascular necrosis of the femoral head content on social media: a cross-sectional content analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cross sectional content analysis evaluates chemotherapy health information quality and reliability on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and dissemination of nasopharyngeal cancer health information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the quality of information on gouty arthritis on Chinese internet platforms: A cross-sectional comparative analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on peritoneal dialysis: a Douyin video-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of hyperlipidemia-related short videos on mainstream social media platforms: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about pulmonary hypertension on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Short-form video platforms as a source of ankylosing spondylitis information: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about myocardial infarction on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of cardiac rehabilitation-related short Chinese videos on Douyin and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Understanding how users identify health misinformation in short videos: an integrated analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The theoretical impact of AI-based quality evaluation of short-video health information on public cognition and treatment adherence: a case study of denosumab combined with PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for lung cancer bone metastasis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Content Quality, Reliability, and Factors Associated With Likes of Venous Thromboembolism-Related Short Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A Cross-Platform Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial modality in cancer treatment. In recent years, the rise of short-form video platforms has transformed how the public accesses medical information. TikTok and Bilibili, as leading short-video platforms, have emerged as significant channels for disseminating health information. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate the quality and reliability of the information related to RT available on these platforms. Objective: This study aims to systematically assess the information quality and reliability of RT-related short-form videos on TikTok and Bilibili platforms using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) evaluation tool, thereby elucidating the current landscape and challenges of digital health communication. Methods: This study systematically retrieved the top 100 RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili as of February 25, 2025. The quality of the videos was assessed using the GQS (1-5 points) and an mDISCERN scoring system (1-5 points). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, as well as Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses, to ensure the reliability and validity of the results. Results: A total of 200 short-form videos related to RT were analyzed, revealing that the overall quality of videos on TikTok and Bilibili is unsatisfactory. Specifically, the median GQS for TikTok was 4 (IQR 3-4), while for Bilibili, it was 3 (IQR 3-4). The median mDISCERN scores for both platforms were 3 (IQR 2-4 and 3-4, respectively), and no significant differences were observed between the 2 platforms regarding the GQS (P=.12) and mDISCERN score (P=.10). On TikTok, 53% (53/100) of videos had a GQS of 4 or higher ("good" quality or better). On Bilibili, 45% (45/100) of videos had an mDISCERN score of 4 or higher, indicating "relatively reliable" quality. Videos produced by professionals, institutions, and nonprofessional institutions had significantly higher mDISCERN scores than those made by patients, with statistical significance (P<.001, P<.001, and P<.01, respectively). Furthermore, the correlations between the number of bookmarks and video duration, with mDISCERN scores, were 0.172 (P=.02) and 0.192 (P=.007), respectively. However, no video variables were found to predict the overall quality and reliability of the videos effectively. Conclusions: This study revealed that the overall quality of RT-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili is generally low. However, videos uploaded by professionals demonstrate higher information quality and reliability, providing valuable support for patients seeking guidance on health care management and treatment options for cancers. Therefore, improving the quality and reliability of video content, particularly that produced by patients, is crucial for ensuring that the public has access to accurate medical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.