Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986767›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of oncology nursing2025

Oncology Nurse Well-Being and the Electronic Health Record-Generated Nurse-Patient Assignment.

Sharon Catherine Le Roux, Teresa K Phan, Kimberly K Hatchel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sharon Catherine Le RouxSharon Catherine Le Roux.
Teresa K PhanTeresa K. Phan.
Kimberly K HatchelKimberly K. Hatchel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA consistent process for the creation of equitable nurse-patient assignments is absent on many inpatient nursing units.

objectivesLeveraging the electronic health record nurse-patient assignment tool, this evidence-based practice project aimed to promote oncology nurse well-being and satisfaction.

methodsThe project team used the Iowa Model Revised. The team collected participant demographics, pre- and postintervention Well-Being Index responses, and individual evaluations of the effectiveness of the manual assignment tool compared to the electronic health record nurse-patient assignment predictive model.

findingsPostimplementation, a significant number of oncology nurses reported a decrease in physical health impeding their ability to work. Findings suggest oncology nurses experience less depression and anxiety as their years of oncology experience increase. The electronic health record nurse-patient assignment predictive model alleviates stress for clinical nurses and supports equitable assignments and clinician well-being.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsJob SatisfactionNurse-Patient RelationsNursing Staff, HospitalOncology NursingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedelectronic health recordnurse–patient assignmentstresswell-beingworkload

Identifiers

PMID40986767
PMCPMC12463150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.