Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025
Validating the Efficacy of a Mobile Digital Therapeutic for Insomnia (WELT-I): Randomized Controlled Decentralized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of digital therapeutics in improving sleep quality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- SleepPathfinder: A Socratic Questioning and Self-Decision-Based Chatbot to Support User Engagement in Digital CBT-I: Usability and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has proven to be an effective treatment; however, its accessibility is limited. To address this issue, digital therapeutics for insomnia (DTx-Is), which are software-driven interventions designed to treat insomnia based on CBT-I, have emerged as a potential solution to enhance access. Objective: This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of WELT-I, a DTx-I. Due to the impact of the global pandemic during the study period, we thought that a decentralized clinical trial (DCT) design that does not require visits to institutions would be appropriate for a clinical study of a digital therapeutic for patients with insomnia. Thus, we also examined the potential of the DCT design as an effective method for validating DTx-Is. Methods: A double-blind, sham-controlled randomized DCT was conducted with participants who met the diagnostic criteria for insomnia. Participants were recruited through advertisements posted on an open-access website. WELT-I is a DTx-I based on CBT-I. A sham app was engineered to mirror WELT-I's installation, login, user engagement, and content delivery processes while maintaining double-blind protocols. After randomization, participants were asked to use WELT-I or the sham app for 6 weeks. All treatment processes were fully automated. Sleep parameters were measured through an app-based sleep diary. Self-report questionnaires on sleep, depression, and anxiety were administered via the app at baseline and the end of the study. The primary outcome was sleep efficiency. To investigate the feasibility of the DCT design, compliance, retention rate, participant satisfaction, and time to reach the recruitment goal were evaluated. Results: A total of 89 participants provided consent and underwent screening, and 68 participants were randomly assigned to the WELT-I group (n=33) or control group (n=35). Among them, 14 participants discontinued the trial, leaving 54 participants who completed the study and were included in the final analysis (28 in the WELT-I group and 26 in the control group). WELT-I significantly improved sleep efficiency (least-squares difference=8.28; P=.04) and dysfunctional beliefs about sleep (least-squares difference=-1.03; P=.008) compared with the sham app. The study completed recruitment in 73 days, and the compliance rate was 95% (186/196) in the WELT-I group and 91% (165/182) in the control group. Moreover, the retention rate was 82% (23/28), and the average satisfaction score was 7.2 out of 10. Conclusions: WELT-I showed significant therapeutic efficacy and safety in improving sleep efficiency and sleep-related dysfunctional attitudes in cases of insomnia. In addition, this study demonstrated the feasibility of DCTs, and the findings of rapid recruitment, high compliance and retention rates, and strong participant satisfaction suggest that DCTs have sufficient potential to be expanded to clinical studies verifying the efficacy of other DTx-Is in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.