Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986692›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2025

Ohio Contrast Cards are reliable and robust to blur under cycloplegia in visually normal children.

Shihij Takoo, Andrew J Toole, Angela M Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shihij TakooDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Andrew J Toole
Angela M Brown

Funding

Short Term Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35EY007151 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Anne Anderson · 1998 to 2026
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS NIH T35 EY007151NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceFew clinical tests of visual performance can be performed equally well regardless of whether the patient has been dilated with a cycloplegic agent. This report shows that the Ohio Contrast Card test (OCC) is reliable across repeated measurements and robust to blur under cycloplegia. PURPOSE: The OCC measures clinical contrast sensitivity, including of patients who cannot read and report the letters on an eye chart. The OCC presents a 0.15 cycle per degree (20/4000, 2.3 logMAR) square-wave grating of variable contrast. We examined the test/retest reliability of the OCC, whether it can be used equally successfully to measure contrast sensitivity before versus after dilation with a cycloplegic agent, and whether it is sensitive to blur from uncorrected refractive error and cycloplegia. Participants were a group of visually normal pediatric optometric patients.

methodsTwo examiners used the OCC to measure the eyes of 38 children who were seen for full eye examinations. Two tests were performed before cycloplegic agents were administered while participants wore their habitual refractive corrections. The examiners were randomly assigned to the two tests. After the eye examination (post-cycloplegia), the measurements were repeated, with and without correction. Statistical analyses examined test/retest reliability before and after cycloplegia and the impact of blur due to cycloplegia and uncorrected refractive error.

resultsThe first two (pre-cycloplegic) tests indicated high reliability. The contrast sensitivity values from the second test were within ±0.15 log 10 units of the first in 97.4% of cases (mean difference = 0.012 log 10 units). Similar results were obtained when the first test was compared with the post-cycloplegic tests, with or without correction. Limits of agreement were the same (±0.220) when the first test was compared with each repeat test. Under cycloplegia, participants' contrast sensitivity was not associated with the absolute amount of blur for the OCC grating. Thus, the OCC results did not depend systematically on the refractive state of the eye in this pediatric population.

conclusionsThe OCC is a reliable test that can be used on pediatric patients irrespective of whether the patient is under cycloplegia. Its resistance to blur is due to the very low-spatial-frequency square-wave target.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityMydriaticsRefractive ErrorsVision TestsVisual AcuityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRefraction, OcularReproducibility of ResultsMydriatics

Identifiers

PMID40986692
PMCPMC13003930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.