Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986649›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2025

Guns in rosettes: The Arabidopsis chemical weapons arsenal.

Marc Somssich, Daniel J Kliebenstein, Tonni Grube Andersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Decoding plant metabolism.Plant physiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marc SomssichMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, NW 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-6168
Daniel J KliebensteinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5759-3175
Tonni Grube AndersenMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, NW 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8905-0850

Funding

Horizon Europe: Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 101107472Horizon Europe: Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions NSF IOS 2020754Horizon Europe: Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions NSF IOS 2434545Horizon Europe: Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions NSF MCB 1906486Horizon Europe: Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions USDA 2019-05709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis) is a small plant with a fast generation time and a well-annotated genome, which makes it ideal for research labs. It is arguably the most used model species in basic plant sciences. Over the past half century, studies in Arabidopsis have generated enormous insight into fundamental principles of plant life, ranging from mechanistic molecular biology to the complexities of interacting ecosystems. Based on research in Arabidopsis, we now understand that while basic cellular metabolism is generally conserved across species, variation in specialized metabolite enzymes gives rise to complex bouquets of chemical weapons that are tightly interwoven with the environment. Understanding how these are produced, regulated, and-especially-how they are deployed remains a key research area for plant immunity. The breadth of work in Arabidopsis provides a unique window into this complicated aspect of life as a plant. We are happy to have an opportunity to share our common interest in these aspects in this review. Due to space constraints, we focus on compounds produced by Arabidopsis with demonstrated antimicrobial properties. We hope that this focus (despite our eagerness to write more) will inspire new avenues of research that will contribute to a more complete understanding of immunity.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisPlant Defense Against HerbivoryArabidopsis ProteinsPlant ImmunityArabidopsis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40986649
PMCPMC12502057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.