Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Understanding disappearances in Mexico City: A data-driven analysis.

Daniel Aguilar-Velázquez, Ruben Calvario Peréz, Carlos Mondragón Mendoza, Alfonso Valenzuela-Aguilera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel Aguilar-VelázquezInstituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3229-9225
Ruben Calvario PerézEscuela Superior de Cómputo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México.
Carlos Mondragón MendozaEscuela Superior de Cómputo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México.
Alfonso Valenzuela-AguileraFacultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mexico is facing an escalating crisis of violence, marked by a sharp increase in disappearances. However, key information remains unknown, such as the typical profile of victims, geographic hotspots, and the relationship between disappearances, economic conditions, and public security. We used a government database of 3,450 disappearances in Mexico City, together with scraped data, to analyze the phenomenon of missing persons. We found that disappearances are not homogeneously distributed along Mexico City, the central district has the highest disappearance rate per capita, which can be attributed to city mobility for job locations. Men account for 62.5% of missing persons, but women aged 15-19 are the most vulnerable group. There is a strong correlation (r=0.95) between reports of drug dealing and disappearances, both of which may be related to the presence of organized crime. Furthermore, when disappearances are normalized to account for mobility related to job locations, a strong negative correlation (r=-0.7) emerges between disappearances and housing prices. This suggests a pattern of socio-economic segregation in disappearances, with higher rates in areas with lower housing prices. Integrating data on disappearances, housing prices, reports of drug dealing, and perception of insecurity for each municipality, we implemented K-means algorithm. Without spatial information, K-means divided Mexico City in west and east. In the east side, people are more vulnerable to disappearances than those in the west side.

Indexed as

ViolenceAdolescentAdultCitiesDrug TraffickingFemaleHumansMaleMexicoSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40986631
PMCPMC13652337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.