ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2026
Multiclass Arrhythmia Classification Using Multimodal Smartwatch Photoplethysmography Signals Collected in Real-Life Settings.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiclass Arrhythmia Classification Using Multimodal Smartwatch Photoplethysmography Signals Collected in Real-Life Settings.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Multi class photoplethysmography-based deep model for cardiovascular disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- A two-stage deep learning framework for predicting the onset of Atrial fibrillation using RR interval-based embeddings.Biocybernetics and biomedical engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSmartwatches with photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensors are ideal for early atrial fibrillation (AF) detection through continuous monitoring. However, prior deep learning was limited either to controlled environments, to minimize motion artifacts, or to short duration data collection. Additionally, premature atrial/ventricular contractions (PAC/PVC), which often confound AF detection algorithms, remains understudied due to limited datasets. Current state-of-the-art methods achieve only 75% sensitivity for PAC/PVC class on minimally motion artifact corrupted PPG data, despite showing 97% AF detection accuracy.
methodsWe addressed the above limitations using data from the recently completed NIH-funded Pulsewatch clinical trial which collected over two weeks of smartwatch PPG data from 106 subjects. Our computationally efficient 1D bi-directional Gated Recurrent Unit deep learning model incorporated multi-modal inputs (1D PPG, accelerometer, and heart rate data) to classify normal sinus rhythm, AF, and PAC/PVC.
resultsOur model achieved an unprecedented 83% sensitivity for PAC/PVC detection while maintaining a high accuracy of 97.31% for AF detection, outperforming the best retrained state-of-the-art model by 20.81% and 2.55%, respectively. It was also 14 times more computationally efficient and 2.7 times faster. Testing on two external PPG datasets collected with a different smartwatch and a fingertip PPG sensor, our model demonstrated better generalizability with macro-averaged AUROC values of 96.22% and 94.17%, respectively.
conclusionA light-weight multimodal input deep learning model can accurately distinguish PAC/PVC from AF, reducing false positive detection of AF. SIGNIFICANCE: Accurate AF and PAC/PVC detection with minimal false positive detection can enhance clinical and public acceptance of smartwatch-based AF monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.