Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986552›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Loneliness is not associated with attention interference of negative social information: Evidence from four studies.

Anita Restrepo, Emily M Silver, Karen E Smith, Sabina Raja, Frederica Rockwood, Colleen Wohlrab, Kelly E Faig, Greg J Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anita RestrepoDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1185-8873
Emily M SilverDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Karen E SmithDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Sabina RajaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Frederica RockwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Colleen WohlrabDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Kelly E FaigDepartment of Psychology, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York, United States of America.
Greg J NormanDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended experiences of loneliness, defined as perceived social isolation, are associated with lasting impacts on health outcomes. One proposed mechanism through which loneliness contributes to health risk is heightened vigilance to cues of social threat resulting in extended activation of stress responses systems. This heightened vigilance is thought to be driven by loneliness-related shifts in a variety of cognitive and affective processes, though the differential effects of loneliness on specific stages of processing remain unclear. The present study examined four datasets using individual participant data meta-analytical techniques to test the link between loneliness and attention interference to social threat cues in an Emotional Stroop task. Despite existing theoretical frameworks predicting heightened attentional interference for negative social information in lonely individuals, we found no support for this effect across the four samples. These findings highlight the need for further work delving into the complex interplay between distinct perceptual processes associated with loneliness and how they contribute to the maintenance of loneliness states over time.

Indexed as

AttentionLonelinessAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleSocial IsolationStroop TestYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40986552
PMCPMC12456806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.